OIC Legal Action Tracker 18AUG20

[Gummo]

Donate!

[Gummo]

Yes and any reimbursement for the applicants court costs will come from the same place. Double whammy !

Will be less than what the gov't will dump in to the "buyback"...

[twosmokinspades]

Yes and any reimbursement for the applicants court costs will come from the same place. Double whammy !

Well look at it this way, the gun grabbers have to pay there fair share for us to get to keep our guns.

[R005t3r]

If every firearm owner in Canada gave $100 to a legal defence, think what we might be able to accomplish. That would be roughly $200,000,000 which could be a formidable force to recon with.

Exactly this! Money talks....

[Aprilia Man]

Hi Guys,

I just want to ask, what are the outcomes we are expecting "IF" these legal actions will be successful?

If I am not mistaken, the only way to repeal Bill C-71 and the May 1, 2020 OIC is for a gun friendly party with a super majority seat in the house could do that with a new bill.

Any input will be very helpful.

Thanks

[Meyer12th]

Status: Filed
1)
Date Filed: 21May2020
Legal Team Lead: Solomon Friedman, EDELSON FRIEDMAN BLACK LLP
Applicant: Casandra Parker
Application Basis:
SOR/2020-96 is not made within the the authority of the Governor in Council granted by sections 84 (1) and 117.15 (1) of the Criminal Code concerning prohibiting firearms that are of reasonable of use in Canada for hunting or sporting purpose. In addition, it is inconsistent with s. 1(a) of the Canadian Bill of Rights concerning the right to the “enjoyment of property”

Organization affiliated: NFA ( gun org )


Status: Intention to File Declared
1)
Legal Team Lead: Laura Warner, JSS Barristers
Applicant: N/A
Application Basis:
No details. It is claimed to be based on Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Organization affiliated: CCFR ( gun org )

2)
Legal Team Lead: Greg Dunn and Caitlin Taylor, Dunn and Associates
Applicant: N/A ( presumed to be The Shooting Edge )
Application Basis:
No Details.

Organization affiliated: The Shooting Edge ( business )

* This will be updated as information becomes public.

Donated a $100 on the NFA website, stipulated that the donation was for Parker vs Canada. Will be doing the same again next month.
Donate! And spread the word.

[10x]

Hi Guys,

I just want to ask, what are the outcomes we are expecting "IF" these legal actions will be successful?

If I am not mistaken, the only way to repeal Bill C-71 and the May 1, 2020 OIC is for a gun friendly party with a super majority seat in the house could do that with a new bill.

Any input will be very helpful.

Thanks

If the Judicial review is successful the May 1, 2020 Order in Council will become null and will not be regulation.
Evidence presented in this Judicial review will be crucial to any review or amendments to the Firearms act administrative infractions and associated criminal code penalties for infractions with no victim or violence
This judicial review is pivotal in the future of how gun laws are made and regulations are created.

[GuiltySpark]

Money talks and while I'll support and attend protests it's in the courts that we have any hope of success.

Rejoined the CCFR. Seeing the NFA getting involved I'm going to renew my membership there as well.

[Aprilia Man]

If the Judicial review is successful the May 1, 2020 Order in Council will become null and will not be regulation.
Evidence presented in this Judicial review will be crucial to any review or amendments to the Firearms act administrative infractions and associated criminal code penalties for infractions with no victim or violence
This judicial review is pivotal in the future of how gun laws are made and regulations are created.

If a Federal Court is willing to hear the case would that mean that the May 1, 2020 OIC cannot be enforced until the court decides if the OIC is null or can be enforced?

[10x]

If a Federal Court is willing to hear the case would that mean that the May 1, 2020 OIC cannot be enforced until the court decides if the OIC is null or can be enforced?

There may be a request that the Federal court declare a "stay" that delays enforcement of the Order in Council until the Judicial review is decided one way or the other.
If the "stay" is not granted then the Order in Council is in force and effective during the duration of the judicial review

This is not a lawsuit, it is a judicial review of an Order in Council to determine if the Order in council is valid

https://efiling.fct-cf.gc.ca/efiling...80gD5AXQ3EKHTu