Originally Posted by
Bartok5
John,
Do you think that there is a valid discriminatory aspect to the OIC which could be leveraged in court, based on the fact that the government has banned the very rifle (AR15) that makes participation in the shooting sports achievable and enjoyable for youth, females and those of both sexes with physical disabilities? It strikes me that of all potential firearms, the AR15 is the lightest, best-balanced, most adaptable and least recoiling design of the bunch. Those characteristics make the "Modern Sporting Rife" particularly suitable for folks like me who are confined to a wheelchair. Can the fact that the Government of Canada is now denying me the use of my AR15s (and variants), be considered discriminatory against a persons with physical disabilities?