Page 9 of 18 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 173

Thread: JUDICIAL REVIEW of OIC and Coalition for gun control

  1. #81
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Bigbubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    SW Ontario
    Posts
    3,890
    Donated via EMT
    Keep up the Fight guys !

    I would buy a hoodie if you had any XL or XXL

  2. #82
    Newbie OvShov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    kootenays
    Posts
    29
    Donating right now.

    Thank you Mr wolverine for fighting the fight.

  3. #83
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer nowarningshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    On a Island in the Pacific. Gulf Islands
    Posts
    11,983
    So if they testify, expose.their funding and make them produce financial documents. Both as.a.society and personally.
    A free society must outlaw harming innocent people to function, but when we seek to curtail what all of us can do, rather than holding each of us responsible for what we actually do, we give up on freedom itself.

  4. #84
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    67
    John, as mentioned getting them to present their evidence could be a good thing, what fact based evidence they have would be interesting to see if they have any to present. Also find out how much they get from the government in funding donations,this may exempt them from intervener status all together? Ask Ed If you can have it ruled by the judge when you win that the coalition is responsible to pay your Legal expenses if they try and drag out your case!

    They obviously chose your case thinking you are the little fish! How funny in the Montreal gazette article tried to make it out like evil corporate giant Marstar was attacking a poor little volunteer organization Poly and now the National Coalition is attacking an individual!

  5. #85
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Ground Zero
    Posts
    16,482
    Quote Originally Posted by Ajax148 View Post
    John, as mentioned getting them to present their evidence could be a good thing, what fact based evidence they have would be interesting to see if they have any to present. Also find out how much they get from the government in funding donations,this may exempt them from intervener status all together? Ask Ed If you can have it ruled by the judge when you win that the coalition is responsible to pay your Legal expenses if they try and drag out your case!

    They obviously chose your case thinking you are the little fish! How funny in the Montreal gazette article tried to make it out like evil corporate giant Marstar was attacking a poor little volunteer organization Poly and now the National Coalition is attacking an individual!
    You aren't going to get CGC, or poly excluded from participation based being in receipt of government funding. Most advocacy groups receive some degree of government funding. All CGC has to do is convince the judge that they have an interest in the case, which is a pretty low bar considering gun crime affects everyone, and that they information which could affect the courts decision. This is a judicial review of an order by the governor in council to prohibit certain firearms. Does CGC have information about cabinet discussions? Does CGC have information on policy decisions taken by the Public Safety Minister, the commissioner of firearms, or the Registrar? Does CGC have information on the technical nature of the prohibited firearms? Do they have statistical information on the use of these firearms which can not even the Canadian Firearms Program seems able to produce?

    The obvious answer to all of these questions is no. But that is for the court to decide. There isn't much we can do to stop someone from intervening. But we can rebut all of the nonsense that they are going to present, if they are permitted to participate. That should be pretty easy.

    It will be interesting to see if CGC applies for intervener status in any of the other court challenges, such as the ones filed in Ottawa or Calgary. Those would be much more expensive for them to participate in.
    Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is sort of an advance auction sale of stolen goods. HL Mencken. 1919.

  6. #86
    CGN Regular MellyVinelli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    127
    Donate by EMT. I know it isn’t much but a huge investment of mine is on the line. Thank you for doing what you do to stick up for our way of life!

  7. #87
    CGN frequent flyer Moparman1303's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,143
    GoFundMe page is down!

  8. #88
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    22,436
    Go fund Page down again?

  9. #89
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    67
    This was mentioned "An intervener is a person or organization who does not have a direct interest in a particular court or tribunal proceeding", I guess the case may have to be assigned to a Court/Judge? Then a ruling may have to be made as to who can participate? John is taking the govt to court, not the CGC, they have no interest in John’s issues with the government other than they support the government position. It could be ruled as interference if they were allowed to intervene?
    Last edited by Ajax148; 06-26-2020 at 11:54 AM. Reason: Spelling

  10. #90
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Northern BC
    Posts
    2,731
    Fired off a donation. Thanks for spear heading one of these lawsuits. It really is a public service you're doing here.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •