Donated.
Donated.
This seems to be the key finding against the CRC's assertion that regulation of firearms secures Charter Section 7 rights for victims of domestic violence:
[21] In response, the Crown contends that the absence of measures aimed at reducing an existing risk of harm does not amount to a state-imposed deprivation, as specifically required by section 7 of the Charter.
So similar to the same way that failing to breathalize every driver before they start their car does not deprive every other driver of their Charter Section 7 rights.
I am not a lawyer and all that.
I knew he was sick but didn't realize he was stepping away since I have seen recent updates, that is really not good, he is such an asset to this community.
I hadn't heard of Gary Mauser until you mentioned him, I've got some reading to do i think.
I would say he wouldn't be interested in intervening, but might be able to act as an "expert witness" to counter act the CGC's emotional bull crap.
John,
Posted the details to a small group I moderate (350ish members) so I hope you’ll get a bit of support from them. My EMT will be inbound on Monday. Keep up the good work!
EMT sent. Make room in the war wagon!
MODS: You should make this a sticky on the main page, or create a sub forum where all the legal actions can be found so we know what's going on and where to send money, instead of looking around for them. The legal actions, and no other threads perhaps? (to keep it simple and neat)
'"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" - US Declaration of Independence