Sooooo its not really a Revocation letter....

[Wiskey1]

nice thing about being in the country,all these newly prohibited firearms are still being used the same as before,thousands of gun owners just give the RCMP and Liberals the finger,they have some pretty clever ways of transporting them to,,LOL.gotta love it,screw the libtards and their RCMP overlords,never used to see AR's in the woods,now they're around all the time,it's like hardcore owners have had enough,and THEY choose to do what THEY want,amazing how not a single one has been stopped or bothered yet.

[ColKurtz]

I was at the range this weekend and some total chad was shooting his AR. Zero Effs given. Ballsy. Place was pretty busy too, nobody batted an eyelash.

[phillyblt]

Thanks

[Suther]

I also noticed that it didn’t address the use of said firearms for sustenances hunting. Since I’m an aboriginal (Chipewyan and Labradormuit) I would like to exercise my rights to do so. Thus how would I go about to accomplish such an activity.

Plus, a question for the group. Since Section 35 specifically mentions self govt and self-determination. Wouldn’t it be thus reasonable for the aboriginal community as a whole to either create a work around or just ignore it?

Except you have no right to. They were previously restricted guns, so you couldn't hunt with them before. Only the guns that you could hunt with before, such as a Stag10 can you continue to use in sustenance hunting, and previously NR guns don't have registration certificates, thus their registration cannot be "administratively expired".

[smokehorizon]

I also noticed that it didn’t address the use of said firearms for sustenances hunting.

It does: "They cannot be legally used for hunting unless allowed through the Amnesty Order".

But as has been said elsewhere, this "nullification" only applies to previously Restricted firearms, which could not be used for hunting anyway and are still not permitted for hunting under the amnesty order.

[metamatt]

I also noticed that it didn’t address the use of said firearms for sustenances hunting. Since I’m an aboriginal (Chipewyan and Labradormuit) I would like to exercise my rights to do so. Thus how would I go about to accomplish such an activity.

Plus, a question for the group. Since Section 35 specifically mentions self govt and self-determination. Wouldn’t it be thus reasonable for the aboriginal community as a whole to either create a work around or just ignore it?

You don't have to be aboriginal to use a newly prohibited firearm for sustenance hunting during the 2 year amnesty but there are a couple of other requirements that may be hard to meet

[nowarningshot]

Excellent, calm, well written, no opinion letter.

[Big-boss-man]

This is absolutely intentionally written to prevent Canadian Citizens from exercising their rights. This is right out of political 101, bend the knee to the new king, win at all costs (even basic human dignity), because they 'feel' justified.
The new liberal ideology that has been festering over the last couple decades is: we are right, and all that don't agree will be politically (as in with words) assassinated. Their ideology > all else. Just look past the 49th parallel and see it on full display.

to add to this:
has everyone already forgotten that poly sent a letter to Bill BLiar demanding that we no longer have a s74 recourse?

[Nickhoffmeier]

Thank you Mr. Wolverine

[BabySeal]

I have an AR that I bought before May the first. The transfer was approved AFTER the OIC went through. I never received a registration certificate for the rifle. I got my nullification letter yesterday. It is not listed there.

What should I do?