No. it is in current case transcripts of cross examination of Murray Smith, who gave the government the list of OiC prohibs, and later edited the FRT with all "AR family" variants.
https://ln2.sync.com/dl/af1c6c880/tt...y9u39-yh9zvvhi
Interim injunctions folder, 29th is dealing with OIC and FRT, the rest with specific firearms.
He under oath testified, paraphrasing. AR family includes 4 distinct subsets. AR-15 (which includes 90s AR-10), M16, M4 and AR-10 (50s). Deriya 12GA shotgun, while having different barrel, bolt, magazine and receiver is a variant of AR10 (50s). If you go and bother to look at it it just looks like AR10 (50s).
When confronted that it is his opinion and not the law, he said it is a "determination" and agreed and said that police and crown will charge people base on his opinion and it is up to accused to prove their innocence.
You can of course, being under illusion that you have any rights regarding your "borrowed" property, keep buying "assault style" semis. Just be aware that under current legislation nothing prevents RCMP from re-classifying anything as a variant of anything, it just have to look like one.
yes, if, Alberta tactical wins the case, it will be different. let's hope judge has the balls to define a "variant" and start what is essentially a rewrite of the firearms act.