We do and always have....
http://app.cpic-cipc.ca/English/searchformproperty.cfm
Provided it was reported stolen.
Why exactly do you distrust any of the normal ways to ensure consumer protection?
Do you require more?
We do and always have....
http://app.cpic-cipc.ca/English/searchformproperty.cfm
Provided it was reported stolen.
Why exactly do you distrust any of the normal ways to ensure consumer protection?
Do you require more?
I understand the gun is legally owned. I don't get the registered part of the story.
People who do not store firearms securely do us all a diservice and play right in to the hands of anti gunners. I can't help but think they should be charged....
Dang! I see why you all would be questioning that! Was there ever any closure on this story?
He would not be a victim if he had stored his firearm more securely. A bag and a trigger lock is not going to deter a thief....
We'll have to agree to disagree. I just hope you take a minute to reevaluate your thinking because it could be applied poorly to a lot of different scenarios.
An assumption on your part.
How do you know the gun wasn't inside a locked room inside a locked house? Nowhere in the press release states the manner in which the gun was stored except that it was in a bag.
I have deadbolts on my gunroom. 5-10min of kicking will probably still get you in.
He's not wrong. It's every gun owners responsibility to make sure that things are stored safely and securely. This was safe but not secure. If he had it in a cabinet or safe, its less likely this would be a news article.
They are deterents more than anything. Thieves want to be in and out as quickly and quietly as possible. The gun was practically gift wrapped for him.
Its the equivalent of locking your car with the windows down.