Hornady - RAPiD Safe Night Guard

[mclmm]

I own one. I am extremely satisfied. Only nitpick is just wish clock dimmer had lower settings between low and off.

A rectangular piece of dark window tint material would knock down the brightness.

[Randoengholio8]

That would do the trick, not sure why didn't come to mind. Don't want to dim all way because clock is night time reference for rfid tag unlock.

[shawn]

These are great use them on tons of stuff

https://www.amazon.ca/LightDims-Orig...743371&sr=8-12

Also I have one of these safes and they are great

Shawn

[FyreFighter]

Have you ever heard of mens rea? If something is called a safe and you think its a safe why would you be prosecuted under some technicality?

Have you ever heard of "strict liability" and "absolute liability"?

The law:

86 (1) Every person commits an offence who, without lawful excuse, uses, carries, handles, ships, transports or stores a firearm, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons.

Contravention of storage regulations, etc.
(2) Every person commits an offence who contravenes a regulation made under paragraph 117(h) of the Firearms Act respecting the storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising and mail-order sales of firearms and restricted weapons.

Charges under 86(2) ("improper storage") are strict liability. There's no mention of "without lawful excuse", or "reasonable". It's like running a red light. You either did it or you didn't.

[Tesro Inc]

Hello folks, just received more of these.

[powerbaitron]

Have you ever heard of "strict liability" and "absolute liability"?

The law:

86 (1) Every person commits an offence who, without lawful excuse, uses, carries, handles, ships, transports or stores a firearm, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons.

Contravention of storage regulations, etc.
(2) Every person commits an offence who contravenes a regulation made under paragraph 117(h) of the Firearms Act respecting the storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising and mail-order sales of firearms and restricted weapons.

Charges under 86(2) ("improper storage") are strict liability. There's no mention of "without lawful excuse", or "reasonable". It's like running a red light. You either did it or you didn't.

So what defines a safe then? Either its a safe or it isn’t. Would a reasonable person think something sold as being a “safe” is a “safe”. What would a person be guilty of? How is it unsafe?

[PhantomAR]

So what defines a safe then? Either its a safe or it isn’t. Would a reasonable person think something sold as being a “safe” is a “safe”. What would a person be guilty of? How is it unsafe?

Don't take this as legal advice, as I am not qualified to give you that. However, in case law in the past the courts ruled that a "safe" is a "safe" if its advertised as a safe and this definition is generally accepted. During the course of trial that set this precedence, evidence used to proof the safe is a safe (even if its clearly a flimsy box) was that the item in question, the safe, was traced back to the manufacture description in which the manufacture advertised that the item was a safe and therefore in the eyes of law it is a safe.

[shawn]

Don't take this as legal advice, as I am not qualified to give you that. However, in case law in the past the courts ruled that a "safe" is a "safe" if its advertised as a safe and this definition is generally accepted. During the course of trial that set this precedence, evidence used to proof the safe is a safe (even if its clearly a flimsy box) was that the item in question, the safe, was traced back to the manufacture description in which the manufacture advertised that the item was a safe and therefore in the eyes of law it is a safe.

No it was not

It was ruled that if it is metal and locks its a safe under the firearms act. There is nothing about what it is sold as, marketed as or manufactured as a safe. In the case the "safe" in question was a modified school locker

Ruling was metal and locks, that's it

Shawn

[powerbaitron]

So then there should be no problem with this “safe”.

[DSX]

1041hrs... princess should have been up hours ago doing PT, and cleaning his kit...