If you sold the tracksuit with the rifle you’d sell even more.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
If you sold the tracksuit with the rifle you’d sell even more.
UNPROFOR 94/95, SFOR 2001
Member of the CCFR and CPC.
If you are not donating $20/month to the CPC then you are not serious about owning and keeping your guns.
Okay now we need the comparison video of a WS MCR in 7.62. I enjoy the video reviews, honest information.
Veteran
They are like a dragunov not an sks! Look at a diassembled svd
I wanted to see if the longer barrel is actually any more accurate and see what the Chronograph says. Cool Video though.
Someone should compare. Just for fun
CCFR Member
He just doesn't like LMG's. It is not intended the way he used it. That's what the standard versions are for. I call the review a fail.
Hilarious... great video.
Alberta... Now Rat, Federal Liberal and rivet free!
X2 ..entertaining but a FAIL as a reviewOriginally Posted by scianna54
Love these videos! Thanks guys.
CSSA/CCFR Member • An unjust law, is no law at all. ― Martin Luther (1483-1546)
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest. ― Elie Wiesel
Agreed, I think he took this firearm completely out of context. I think he focused on it's negatives as a SA rifle instead of a prone fired longer distance rifle. After all it has a longer, heavier barrel and bipod. Prone shooting from 100-300M distances to show accuracy compared to type 81 or sks would have been a better use of his time, IMO
If you add more twist in rifle, you get more faster bootlet comrade.
https://imgur.com/3EcFif3
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote