Liberals invoke S.39, refuse to provide evidence

[CommonCents]

...

[Jmcc]

This is incredibly important for people to understand.

This is confirmation from the highest public service position in our country that the underlying rationale the government used to ban these firearms is so utterly damning that it CANNOT be made public.

We are simply left to speculate as to why exactly that is.

I think this is where we need to reach out to MSM and push this.

Liberals went on record that they would make decisions based on data. They would be transparent with the people. we all knew that wasn't true, but they are on record saying it.

Its not about What they did, its about How they did it.

The MSM may actually get on board that.
How can criteria used to make a publicly available list be considered a state secret?

[ReverendX]

I have no faith in this country anymore.

[CommonCents]

...

[phillyblt]

What a joke. Usually the criminals have something to hide. Hmmm

[domdel]

I plead the S39, Your Honour.

[taeish]

Colour me shocked when public trust in government declines when they enact policies with no evidence

[hsatimmy]

Any word from the Judge's side on for a timeline for a response, perhaps previously mentioned?

is there precedent for this action?

Curious to see how things turn out but I am not willing to wait lol

[Gary V]

I am not clear that s39 allows the govt to hide any evidence. They can hide stuff that breaches the confidentiality of the Privy Council. If your "evidence" is the discussions held by the privy council, then we are grasping at straws. I hope the court case has other options to stop this f-g OIC.

[L86 All Terrain]

We are simply left to speculate as to why exactly that is.

The meeting minutes from the You En telling JT if he tosses an OIC at us they will give him a better shot at getting a seat.