Page 1 of 24 1234567891121 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 237

Thread: Liberals invoke S.39, refuse to provide evidence

  1. #1
    Business Member Rep Wolverine .303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Lattitude - 49.89617 | Longitude - 100.85384
    Posts
    1,213

    Liberals invoke S.39, refuse to provide evidence

    Today, Bruce Hughson of the Department of Justice forwarded a notice to the Federal Court concerning our case against the Attorney General of Canada. The notice is to inform the court that the government has invoked Section 39 of the Canada Evidence Act. This is an action that the Clerk of the Privy Council can take to "make secret" any materials the government doesn't want the public to see. This puts the materials, in this case the government's evidence, beyond the reach of anyone, even the courts. Supposedly, this sweeping power is exercised when the material is so sensitive, it is against the public interest to disclose it.

    READ THE NOTICE HERE


    The certificate invoking S. 39 was signed by the Interim Clerk of the Privy Council, Janice Charette. Keep in mind, in late May, Judge Gagne ordered the government to provide its evidence to her alone, not the public. She would then evaluate if the materials were too sensitive for public disclosure. It appears that the government believes the evidence they used to ban up to a million firearms owned exclusively by licensed gun owners is too secret (or dangerous) to have even a federal judge view it.

    Many questions come to mind. What is in the government's evidence that's so secret or such a danger to national security that even the Associate Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Canada can't see it? What could it possibly be? Could it be that the government has no evidence at all, and the prohibition is simply a political wedge issue to divide Canadians and secure urban votes? If so, what an incredibly corrupt use of government power that would be. Why wouldn't the government just deal fairly with gun owners? We aren't criminals, we haven't done anything to deserve this.


    Regardless, this isn't the worst thing to happen to our case. Our team will ask the Judge to make an "adverse inference" against the government to the effect that whatever it is they are hiding would either hurt their case or at very least not help them. This has the potential to significantly damage their ability to defend.

    Either way, this has become typical of the bad faith dealings of the Liberal Government of Justin Trudeau, Bill Blair & David Lametti the new Attorney General. "Open and transparent government", and "fact-based policy making" they said...

    - .303
    Phone: (204) 748-2454
    E-mail: sales@wolverinesupplies.com
    www.wolverinesupplies.com

  2. #2
    CGN Regular dyeman123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    227
    Wow this may actually screw the libs in the end.

  3. #3
    CGN frequent flyer PaveHammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Kingston, ON
    Posts
    1,051
    I'm shocked.

    Bradley
    If it's worth shooting once, it's worth shooting twice.
    LaRue STEALTH Crusader - Gen4 G34
    LARUEMINATI
    tap, rack, click...?

  4. #4
    CGN frequent flyer CZ Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,912
    We all know that their evidence is exactly zero...they know it too of course.

    They will use any dirty trick in the book to slip out of that one.
    We are dealing with globalist psychopaths unfortunatelly.
    "Gun control" is a feel good term, which is designed to disquise the globalist disarmament efforts under the pretense of fighting crime.

  5. #5
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer bfiles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Training in Camp X
    Posts
    11,163
    Liberals are a joke.....

    Not surprised they would try something like this
    CSSA CCFR PROUD MEMBER
    "Sleep in bliss Pops"!!!!!!

  6. #6
    CGN Regular Snowballs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Back in the free state of Alberta
    Posts
    551
    Just another cover up brought to us by the ruling party. Disgusting.
    Velox Versutus Vigilans

    NRA

  7. #7
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer .22LRGUY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    6,523
    I thought my blood pressure was high before reading this. If there is anyone in Canada still thinking the OIC was born out anything but a desire to see an end to private gun ownership in Canada=take note. This is PURE political meddling, arguably, illegal. An "OIC" is not really a policy creating tool to begin with, let alone, to bring in (what amounts to) sweeping legislation without a shred of democratic process.

    Democracy=a hurdle the Liberals have no use for. How INCREDIBLY disgusting.

    Like my dad used to say about some people; "he doesn't let the truth stand in the way of a good story"

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    91
    Unbelievable - not surprised tho.

  9. #9
    GunNutz murph83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    1,932
    I am not surprised. The libs want what they want and are prepared to do anything to get their way. This is very typical behaviour of the left.
    Liberal party of Canada- Useless since 1867

  10. #10
    Super GunNutz UR2X3M4ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Banana Republik of Kebekistan
    Posts
    2,448
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolverine .303 View Post
    ... Could it be that the government has no evidence at all, and the prohibition is simply a political wedge issue to divide Canadians and secure urban votes?
    This we all suspected/knew from the beginning.

    There is nothing secret on this public matter. There is nothing so sensitive that it cannot be produced for the eyes of the judge only.
    Therfore it is clear the lieberals never had anything solid justifying such unprecedented theft of property.

    Lies and deceits will fire back at them. Pun intended.

    The turd is a failure. All he did so far is a succession of failures and scandals. This will be another one.

    Well done so far Team Hipwell, keep on plowing.
    Quote Originally Posted by DrXenon View Post
    What do you need a brake on a 5.56mm firearm for? You should just slip a maxipad under your bra strap to dampen the hellish recoil.
    Spock to Kirk:
    "Logic dictates Captain. If Pro-Gunners are as violent as Anti-Gunners say they are, there would not be any Anti-Gunners left."

Page 1 of 24 1234567891121 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •