yes from here but did not need it as the prism and the scope are shorter than i thought.Originally Posted by seamus
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
yes from here but did not need it as the prism and the scope are shorter than i thought.
Is it a POSP scope?
CSSA - CCFR - NFA - GOA
"Lex iniusta non est lex" - St. Augustine
no not at all. im running the bushnell 1-4x24 blackout or the prism primary arms 3x i do not think posp is the answer to the way i like it.
Can anyone comment on how the cheekweld is on the folder type 81 with the kobra?
perfect for me no need for extra rest. that is with ti rail as well.
Well I put the Kobra on a folder and I don't know about you guys but it's a chin weld for me to get a good sight picture. Anyone here mess around with a cheek riser on the folder t81.. just looking for some ideas before I tape some foam on there lol
i used an svd cheek for other optics but never for the kobra.
Reviving this old girl.
So I had the dot zeroed at 50m... Everything was working great out to 200 just point-and-shoot on full-size steel...unit...... I changed the reticle to the small dot and chevron... the impact moved about 6 inches right at 100m, I think that the optic is ether canted, or the reticle is canted.
Kind of disappointing, but this confirms that you likely need to zero for the intended reticle... might just be mine that is maybe off-centre.
Is anyone else having this experience?
HONK HONK
I don't notice any left or right change when I switch reticles, I pretty consistently hit the steel at 200 with them all.
That being said, I'm switching to a 3-D rail and I have a second Kobra I haven't zeroed yet so when I get to the range next week I'll be zeroing both Kobras on paper
Arte et Marte
Keep us looped in...Why are you switching out the rail?
HONK HONK
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote