All 3 of my Type 81s definitely do not shoot more accurately then my SKS.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
All 3 of my Type 81s definitely do not shoot more accurately then my SKS.
Just saying it how it is.....
All three of my sks definitely do not shoot more accurately then my type 81.
All of the above 2 statements may be true.
It depends very much on the ammo used and of course the individual rifle.
Apples to oranges.
At current prices you can buy 4 x SKS for one type 81.
The type 81 is flimsy, not worth the current price tag, design is great but no optics mount options other than an overpriced scope/mount system and no aftermarket options.
Id disagree with it being flimsy myself. Compared to a milled receiver? Sure. But by stamped steel firearms go it seems pretty robust.
Just saying it how it is.....
Agreed. I have zero qualms about the long term durability of the Type 81, even under strenuous use.Originally Posted by Murray 3-D
CCFR
"There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men." - Robert Heinlein
Lmfao Im sure an sks with a good barrel just as accurate as a type 81, but it appears most retailers are selling sks between 600-680, so maybe 2 or less sks for a type 81.
The T81 simply isn’t an accurate rifle, with many professional reviews stating the best there getting is 4MOA. If that’s good for you then great, but for the price I’d honestly rather buy a nice sks.
I get an average of 3" at 100yds with the T81 Carbine. Much better accuracy with the LMG, for reduced barrel vibrations. Girth matters
Here is 5 shots with LMG, 200yds, 10" gong, 5 out of 5 hits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gCb4MV79GM
Buy one, you won't be disappointed, I own Russian and Chinese Sks/type56 and the T81 looks better, feels better, shoots better...so much fun and as close to an AK 47 as you will ever get... and Ive had experience with those as well...
When in August are these supposed to be available again?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote