Modern Sporter

[45C]

ATRS , if the former CFO put a stop order on the MS and you now have a new CFO,can you now ask for a review?
Maybe get a positive result and get some quality stuff back on the market?

[Bfranklin]

ATRS , if the former CFO put a stop order on the MS and you now have a new CFO,can you now ask for a review?
Maybe get a positive result and get some quality stuff back on the market?

I'm also curious about this.

[Desjard]

These comments are embarrassing. Never have a seen a group of "freedom loving" gun owners act like such raging p*ssys. Get yourself some legal defense insurance and enjoy shooting your legally owned property. The RCMP are betting that people will be too afraid of unlawful persecution to realize that the FRT IS NOT a lawful document and has absolutely no legal authority. Grow a pair of balls and quit asking permission from people that detest yourself and your values.

Fine print of all firearms legal insurance "if you break the law we won't cover you"

but you do you, post up here for advice when something happens too lol

[alberta tactical rifle]

ATRS , if the former CFO put a stop order on the MS and you now have a new CFO,can you now ask for a review?
Maybe get a positive result and get some quality stuff back on the market?

I believe we are way too far past the point where the new CFO can reverse the former CFOs decision. And to make major changes to our statement of claim, refile it and then re-serve all parties would be expensive and could jeopardize the case completely.

[alberta tactical rifle]

So if a judge asks why it was non restricted before may 2020 and the answer is, it’s not an AR 15 . Then asks why it’s prohibited now and answer is , it’s an AR15 variant.

How can any judge possibly find you guilty?
How would any Crown, even attempt to lay a charge?

There must be some sort of law that penalizes the crown , if they are just trying to cause you financial loss.

I wish that were the case however the government and their agents tend to operate with total impunity regardless if the destroy an innocent persons life.
Unless you are a convicted terrorist, then you become a multi millionaire.

[hsatimmy]

FYI nothing is illegal unless it's law.

Opinion isn't law.

This isn't advice, I just hate how convinced people are that the RCMP just knows the truth and we should trust it. We deserve the right to ask questions and challenge their "decisions"

[Bman12456]

Fine print of all firearms legal insurance "if you break the law we won't cover you"

but you do you, post up here for advice when something happens too lol

Shooting a non restricted Rifle isn't "breaking the law"

The FRT is LITERALLY not law and going against the FRT isn't breaking any laws.

[purplezuk]

Hard to understand how so many people in this sport/hobby have zero clue on laws or what the frt is.
Anything on the oic is law unfortunately, but nothing named after the oic ( assuming it had a nonrestricted frt for 1 year + prior to the oic ) is just some idiots opinion, an opinion that can easily be proven to have zero merit

[Emshey]

And to think this all started with a simple technical question, we are truly our own worst enemy.

[Desjard]

As Ian Runkle says, it'd be interesting (re: expensive) to find out in court just how "not law" the FRT is if the wrong officer stops you.

And if proven to be illegal in court you're on the hook because firearms defense insurance is a joke and won't cover you lol.