Isn’t the modern spotter prohibited now?
Isn’t the modern spotter prohibited now?
I remember this being brought up before, if I recall the answer was yes, the ejection port was large enough. I would spend some time and read through the build questions thread you can find under ATRS on here.
Hi guys,
Question. I would love to build a 458 socom but do you know if your MS's ejection port is large enough and if theframe can handle the thumb?.
Isn’t the modern spotter prohibited now?
FRT isn’t binding by law, it wasn’t in the OIC so it is NR.
The Maccabee defence slr was not mentioned in the OIC ban yet is prohibited, don’t belive me I will gladly send you the clarification email the public saftey office sent me. Sad fact is if your seen with these rifles by a peace officer your getting cuffed and charged.
Doesn't matter what the liberal public office says, if it wasn't mentioned by name in the OIC and is only "prohib" by FRT it is not legally binding, already confirmed by a federal judge, and is why you won't be seeing anyone charged with owning or using a firearm banned only by FRT, and if it did happen the crown would lose in court, which is another reason they won't charge anyone, because then it would be confirmed by the courts and the RCMP and Gov couldn't use the fear of prosecution anymore.
Doesn't matter what the liberal public office says, if it wasn't mentioned by name in the OIC and is only "prohib" by FRT it is not legally binding, already confirmed by a federal judge, and is why you won't be seeing anyone charged with owning or using a firearm banned only by FRT, and if it did happen the crown would lose in court, which is another reason they won't charge anyone, because then it would be confirmed by the courts and the RCMP and Gov couldn't use the fear of prosecution anymore.
I think only the first batch of SS had the bigger ejection port.
Doesn't matter what the liberal public office says, if it wasn't mentioned by name in the OIC and is only "prohib" by FRT it is not legally binding, already confirmed by a federal judge, and is why you won't be seeing anyone charged with owning or using a firearm banned only by FRT, and if it did happen the crown would lose in court, which is another reason they won't charge anyone, because then it would be confirmed by the courts and the RCMP and Gov couldn't use the fear of prosecution anymore.
So if I create a new gun tomorrow that functions like an ar15 and uses all ar15 parts. But has a new name that is not listed in the oic. You think it would be legal?…
The names listed are a list of some examples based on the law wording itself. The list itself is not inclusive