CanadianGunNutz.com logo, Firearms News and Classifieds in Canada

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 75

Thread: Hot off the press re May 18

  1. #61
    Newbie JohnR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Niagara Region
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by powerbaitron View Post
    Have the Conservative candidates spoke about this issue at all in the leadership race?
    Leslyn Lewis. Got an email Yesterday

    Canadians are not afraid of farmers, sports-shooters, or hunters, but that doesn’t stop the Liberals from rolling out another version of their infamous gun registry to punish these groups.

    I desperately want Canada to be the safest country in the world. I know what it’s like to hear about a shooting in downtown Toronto, near where my kids were headed with their friends, and pray that they were alright.

    And though I have never suffered such a tragedy, too many mothers have received the worst possible news one can ever get.

    We need to focus on stopping the flow of illegal firearms being smuggled across our borders, and supporting our law enforcement to shut down real criminal activity.

    We need to invest in effective programs that will stop gangs from preying on vulnerable youth.

    All of this can be accomplished without another heavy-handed and pointless gun ban.

    As my colleague Raquel Dancho pointed out yesterday, the Liberals have not put forward a single policy that would actually accomplish anything to make Canadians safer, and only attack law-abiding firearms owners to make a show.



    When it comes to firearms, government action should focus on keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, while respecting law-abiding Canadians.

    This is exactly how I will approach firearms as Prime Minister.

    I am proposing a full review of ALL current firearms laws. I want to ensure that government efforts are entirely focused on keeping guns out of the hands of gangs and other criminals.

    It’s time for a complete review of Canada’s firearms laws to make sure that they are actually doing what they’re supposed to do. Any law that doesn't follow common sense will have to go.

    We need a simplified classification system that is determined by gun experts, law enforcement, farmers, and sports shooters, instead of politicians and bureaucrats.

    In this race many candidates will have somewhat similar common-sense policies regarding firearms. The reason why I believe I am the candidate best positioned to defend your rights and freedoms is based on both my professional and life experience.

    As a lawyer I have studied these laws and understand their weaknesses. As a mother who raised her children in the GTA, I am best positioned to reveal the hypocrisy and futility of the Liberals' failed policies. As a rural resident and MP my constituents are the ones who are now being punished for no reason by the Liberals and pointless firearm bans.

    As someone who has gone through the Canadian Firearms Safety Course, I know firsthand the strong rules that are in place and the many hoops that law-abiding gun owners already need to jump through.

    Do you agree with my common-sense approach on firearms?

  2. #62
    Super GunNutz Helka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Guelph,ON
    Posts
    618
    Hear’s a thought!?! What’s stopping a person from contacting the individual web service for the transfer and giving them a random serial number for a non existent gun and using someone else’s real Pal number as the recipient of said firearm and just flooding the web service with fake transfers. And when they call the Recipient they have no knowledge. Good system RCMP! Hopefully what I said makes sense. As the transfer is only one sided.

  3. #63
    CGN Regular Sveinn84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    East Kootenays, BC
    Posts
    377
    Nevermind
    Last edited by Sveinn84; 05-13-2022 at 08:37 PM.
    CCFR, CSSA member!

  4. #64
    CGN Regular taeish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    160
    As if CFO phone line is not already swamped. Usually have to call them back 10-30 times before I'm even on the hold line for att .
    Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary

  5. #65
    CGN frequent flyer ravenzoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,221
    Quote Originally Posted by taeish View Post
    As if CFO phone line is not already swamped. Usually have to call them back 10-30 times before I'm even on the hold line for att .
    Supposedly, there will be an online portal. Guess we'll have to see.
    CCFR Member and Libertarian at Heart

  6. #66
    CGN frequent flyer Scarheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by Helka View Post
    Hear’s a thought!?! What’s stopping a person from contacting the individual web service for the transfer and giving them a random serial number for a non existent gun and using someone else’s real Pal number as the recipient of said firearm and just flooding the web service with fake transfers. And when they call the Recipient they have no knowledge. Good system RCMP! Hopefully what I said makes sense. As the transfer is only one sided.
    Runkle of the Bailey has made a video on this where he exposes how this law is the most vulnerable to fraud he could have thought of.

  7. #67
    CGN Regular DougPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Petawawa Ontario Canada
    Posts
    490
    No.

  8. #68
    CGN Regular mussyhairhillbilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    334
    Quote Originally Posted by CZ Shooter View Post
    Once you understand what their goals are, it is not mind boggling at all.
    They are pretty much openly mocking us at this point...they are well aware of the fact, that this has nothing to do with reducing gun crimem
    I second this… anything and everything to bog down private transactions… Miramache will simply leave the phone off the hook, and their online capacity, will be “ down” for “ maintenance “… major discouragement, for private sales.

  9. #69
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Abbotsford B.C. Canada
    Posts
    148
    I have an interesting thought, time to buy those serialized lowers of the guns you want before the 18th of May 2022 get the top part of the firearm 3 weeks later all lengths of the new gun are the same regardless. Now that you have the main part of the gun in your hands which is the serial number prior to the May 18th deadline on your bill of sale indicates you already own the firearm prior to the new regulations they mail it to you after they received your order paid in full. I have seen an example of this from the Shooting Edge. Go figure looks too simple and will go like hot cakes off the griddle in my humble opinion. Long live the freedom of owning a scary gun. I know I have one that is on the prohibited list and it's the Colt AR-15a2 Sporter California prohibition days

  10. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Van. Island
    Posts
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by CZ Shooter View Post
    Tax purposes should be the very least of your concerns.
    They are laying the groundwork for future NR bans and confiscations.
    Agreed,
    But confiscations will never happen (except in association with other warrant execution or complaint/red flag report), not IMO anyway.
    They don't need to so why bother?
    If it's illegal to buy, sell, trade, touch, look at, or leave your house with then mission accomplished.
    Never mind that it essentially amounts to robbing law abiding citizens of their rightful property, purchased lawfully, etc etc.

    Imagine what the sheep will get up to when they realize all they have to do to sleep easy is to make an anonymous phone call and the pony patrol will show up at your house and seize your property?
    Please do us all the courtesy of learning the procedure for removing a post when the item is sold. Making people open your post to find a cryptic "Sold" in the text is rude dude! Edit Post, Go Advanced, PLS Remove. Simple, Courteous.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •