Why would they need a motion from committee when the Libs could just do it via OIC any time they wanted.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Why would they need a motion from committee when the Libs could just do it via OIC any time they wanted.
Member: CSSA
What am I thinking........? If I wanted you to know, I'd be talking!
Legitimacy. If pulling new laws out of their asses was simple, all the guns would've been banned years ago.Originally Posted by soulchaser
SECU has no meeting scheduled for June 14th?
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/SECU/Meetings
Last edited by soulchaser; 06-09-2022 at 10:00 PM.
Member: CSSA
What am I thinking........? If I wanted you to know, I'd be talking!
They banned 1500 models of firearms via OIC. They have passed more OIC's than Harper's government did in fewer years. They have passed 72 OIC's in secret.
They don't care about "legitimacy".
Member: CSSA
What am I thinking........? If I wanted you to know, I'd be talking!
https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/foru...mpt-TheGunBlog
NFA CCFR CSSA
CPC PC Ontario
tag
Models are one thing. Banning an entire class of firearm is another.
Politics isn't all about who has more seats. If the Liberals could do anything they felt like, they could triple their own salaries and arrest the Conservative leadership.
Point is they need at least a veneer of legitimacy to justify the things they do, or they start looking like actual dictators instead of figurative ones.
Thanks, but there is no concrete information in that.
Says they MAY vote next week at a meeting that does not (at least not yet) appear on the SECU schedule.
Member: CSSA
What am I thinking........? If I wanted you to know, I'd be talking!
TheGunBlog.ca reported "The SECU chair said the committee will consider a motion to approve the regulations at its next meeting on June 14th".
The committee meeting can be found here https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees...ngs#2022-06-07 with the attempt to get unanimous consent to move the motion at 11:23:00. As I understand it, this means the motion will be voted on in the next meeting.
The motion was as follows:
"That the committee report the following to the House: That pursuant to section 118 (4)(b)(ii) of the Firearms Act (1998), the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security has decided not to conduct inquiries or public hearings into the proposed regulations tabled and referred to the Committee on May 30th, 2022."
Second reading and debate on bill 21 is happening right now in the house !!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote