If you're going to proclaim "world record", you would think that it's not taking 69 ####ing shots to landOriginally Posted by Ryang5177
lmao
I've shot 105mm artillery with better groupings than that, and that's an area weapon
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
If you're going to proclaim "world record", you would think that it's not taking 69 ####ing shots to land
lmao
I've shot 105mm artillery with better groupings than that, and that's an area weapon
Deleted
Last edited by Beeron; 03-09-2023 at 04:41 PM.
*FAIR WARNING* I LEAVE FEEDBACK FOR ALL TRANSACTIONS AND I EXPECT THE SAME.
This isn't that remarkable though.
After trying to hit a 3000 yard target and a 1kph wind sends the bullet 10 meters off target.
If you think you can do better have at it.
I'm impressed.
The challenge of retirement is how to spend time without spending money.
Remember, it's not what you did once, but what you can do on demand that counts. Fr. Frog
Look around is there someone you can introduce to shooting because that’s the only way we will buck the anti gun trend sweeping Canada! "tigrr 2006"
Repeat the shot 69 times and you will succeed eventually.
This is a lame world record claim. 60 plus shots to hit a target! Common man. This isn't a record to be proud of...this is just a bullchit egotistical dick touching contest. If he wouldn't hit that target with 1-3
rounds that'd be something to talk about. This is nothing more the an example of hit probability from someone who has a bigger ego then brains.
Was he in Laos when he made the shot?
luceo non uro
Canadians have (a) the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof.
Never in doubt, seldom correct.
this
Don't worry, go plinking, be happy!!
As stated the shot needed to be repeatable to be recorded as any kind of record.
If he had taken even 100 shots to zero it, then hit that large target at least twice in a row, or even five times out of 10, he'd have something to share.
I once hit a raccoon at over 1000 yds with a 243. Took over 30 shots, walking bullets all around it throwing up dust, until one happened to hit it. It wasn't stationary either. Yet I never bragged at how accurate that rifle was, nor how skillful I was, as it was a hit that was nothing but chance - it was fun, albeit expensive, and I never tried it again.
Andy
Since 1958
………..
Last edited by johnl; 09-24-2022 at 02:44 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote