View Poll Results: LPVO or Holographic?

Voters
199. You may not vote on this poll
  • LPVO

    98 49.25%
  • Holograpic

    101 50.75%
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 61

Thread: LPVO vs Holographic featuring some X95 Builds

  1. #11
    GunNutz mmcintyre1220's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tillsonburg, Ontario
    Posts
    1,646
    While I don't have an x95, I have recently purchased two LPVO's for sporting rifles. I must say, after using strictly holographic's for the last 10 years... I think I am sold on LPVO's
    Id Rather Be Judged By 12 Than Carried By 6

  2. #12
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    212
    I will take the red dot/holoraphic every single time on the X95 and if I really need to add a magnifier. The weight of the LPVO set up does not make sense to me on the X95. I'm not touching anything out to 300+ and see zero need to have a LPVO.

    Also ACOG+RMR/RDS is still king on this type of build.

  3. #13
    CGN Regular taeish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    245
    wrong thread!
    Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary

  4. #14
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Whitecourt
    Posts
    2,312
    I tried a LPVO and just couldn’t get a good cheekweld even with super high rings.
    Switched to a prism scope and love it
    TDS: What brainwashed people claim when someone isn’t gullible enough to fall for their cult nonsense.

  5. #15
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer xdmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Back in Greater Vancouver
    Posts
    6,224
    Both for different purposes but I've found LPVO to be more versatile, I use holographic when I want light and tight ... and relatively close. I found a good prism scope to be a sweet spot - if only I could find a reticle and scope quality / weight I like in prism.
    Travis Kay
    Proverbs 4:27
    http://www.traviskay.ca [laughably dated]
    http://linkedin.com/in/kaytravis

  6. #16
    CGN Regular Dude in G.P.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Having Fun on The Firing Line
    Posts
    927
    Quote Originally Posted by Tinytitan View Post
    I will take the red dot/holoraphic every single time on the X95 and if I really need to add a magnifier. The weight of the LPVO set up does not make sense to me on the X95. I'm not touching anything out to 300+ and see zero need to have a LPVO.

    Also ACOG+RMR/RDS is still king on this type of build.
    Yep, ACOG on a Unity FAST COG series mount with FAST offset optic base for the RMR. Free floating the barrel with a Manticore Arms Optimus forend makes for some fairly easy shots out to 500yds
    Yep, it's like that.....

  7. #17
    Business Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Cold and unforgiving Siberian tundra fighting bears with my bare hands.
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Canadian-Sniper View Post
    Depends how far you plan to shoot. I have a used a 1-6 to get out to 600 yards but the weight is less than ideal. Red dots are definitely more suited for a balanced package. I hope to see a higher quality alternative to the PA micro 3x prism in the future. That sounds like the sweet spot. Also helps to go 1.92" to 2.2" optic mount height as the comb is nearly identical height with the optic rail. Helps to keep a more natural head position for shooting.
    Quote Originally Posted by kevin9934 View Post
    2 or 3x PA prism all the way
    Quote Originally Posted by Tinytitan View Post
    I will take the red dot/holoraphic every single time on the X95 and if I really need to add a magnifier. The weight of the LPVO set up does not make sense to me on the X95. I'm not touching anything out to 300+ and see zero need to have a LPVO.
    Also ACOG+RMR/RDS is still king on this type of build.
    Quote Originally Posted by coleman1495 View Post
    I tried a LPVO and just couldn’t get a good cheekweld even with super high rings.
    Switched to a prism scope and love it
    Quote Originally Posted by xdmer View Post
    Both for different purposes but I've found LPVO to be more versatile, I use holographic when I want light and tight ... and relatively close. I found a good prism scope to be a sweet spot - if only I could find a reticle and scope quality / weight I like in prism.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dude in G.P. View Post
    Yep, ACOG on a Unity FAST COG series mount with FAST offset optic base for the RMR. Free floating the barrel with a Manticore Arms Optimus forend makes for some fairly easy shots out to 500yds
    Ah, I see you're men of culture as well! You have discovered the secret 3rd option!


    Last edited by Yuri_Wolverine; 10-27-2022 at 10:29 AM.

  8. #18
    Super GunNutz nitroxace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Port Perry, Ontario
    Posts
    3,817
    Although I do not have an X95 I use a LPVO 1x6 on my SL8. On my other black rifle I use a 3x PA micro prism due to my astigmatism. Both options are great but I use each of them for different purposes.

  9. #19
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer mikeyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba
    Posts
    3,506
    I would have to go LPVO, even with corrected astigmatism holo sights and red dots are just blurry smudges. I don't know if I'd be able to get a solid cheek weld though, it looks like it might be a bit low.
    Mikey B

  10. #20
    Business Member MarstarCanada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    946
    Holographic, I find the X95 is not accurate enough to warrant an LPVO
    Marstar Canada
    1-888-744-0066
    sales@marstar.ca

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •