OK
So who is going to be acting differently now, thanks to this PR win? Its going to sway the judges? Its going to make people vote Liberal?
"Dammit, well here I was gonna vote CPC because those gun store owners weren't taking the payout! But now that they are, go Justin"?
It’s clear you are not grasping at all what happened and consequences of the CSAAA actions.
Fortunately, the gun owners - lawyers and people involved in the different court chalenge do realize the effect of that collaboration contract have and will have on the gun-grab agenda. The Medicino media show clearly was made to tell all Canadian (general public) the gun industry was for, and agreed the IOC guns are not for civilian.
Thats a major win - public opinion do matters - we have seen it with C21 G4 on hunting guns. Judge do not live in closed boxes - they are influenced by the same factors we are - see and ear same we do.
You do not and you probably have no IOC guns - money tied up in guns - time and support money to the different court chalenges - so you don’t understand what it mean.
Yes..we should act differently with people - business and org that work against gun owners interest by collaborating with the Libs in implementing their gun grab plans.
Starting by boycotting the business of those CSAAA members who got involved - negotiated and agreed to that contract is a way to clearly let them know we do not agree with their actions. Money talk.
They put themselves in the position to be associated with the Libs gun grab program. They are in it now - in bed with the Libs - negotiated contract over many months - in hand to prove it.
The CSAAA claim, on their web site - representing the industry and are the voices of all hunters and sport shooters. They are not.