Page 1 of 24 1234567891121 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 232

Thread: A Message from Matt Hipwell

  1. #1
    Business Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Cold and unforgiving Siberian tundra fighting bears with my bare hands.
    Posts
    5

    A Message from Matt Hipwell



    Good morning,

    I am shocked by the reaction that came from the vast number of people in the firearms community yesterday. I have been involved in the fight for legal and responsible firearm ownership for over 30 years. It has had an impact on me in more ways than you can count; from Bill C-68 and converted autos being banned, the high-capacity magazine debacle, short barrel handguns, the current OIC and any future amendments.

    I have worn a uniform for over half my life and carried a badge for most of those years, and I have argued in support of firearms owners in parliament, before the senate and was one of the first to join the CCFR court challenge. Does this sound like someone who sold out individual firearms owners on April 26th?

    Why is the firearms community so divided? Much like our country we come from many different backgrounds and beliefs with different levels of conviction. In the 1990’s it was the military firearm owners who had their firearms banned, while many others stood by and said it won’t happen to me. Then the magazine ban, everyone thought their sport would have exemptions. Short-barrel handguns were next, and these were met with the same answer, but the crowd was getting smaller. Owners asked for consultation with the government - there was none. Next came the OIC, met by many court challenges, including the CCFR one which I am an integral part of.

    Owners began to slowly unite; organizations grew in many areas, but there was still missing communication between them all. The (Canadian Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association (CSAAA) went to bat for wholesalers, retailers, and manufacturers - whether they were a member or not. There was finally some consultation with the government, and they were commissioned to complete a research survey to those businesses who wanted to participate, regardless of membership. The Liberal government took advantage of this and spewed their own version. As a board member of the CSAAA, we voted on this contract, and we were told as board members that the NFA, Canadian Shooting Sports Association (CSSA) and CCFR were all consulted with. This survey was to determine what non-saleable inventory businesses were sitting on and provide numbers to the government for potential payment. This was a voluntary process for all firearm business licence holders. Yesterday I learned that varying levels of details were disclosed in these consultations. The lack of clear information is now being used against the CSAAA by many. Personally, I am disappointed by the lack of detail provided and by the reaction of many individuals in the firearms community.

    When I had a concern with an organization a few years back, I went to that organization and met with them in person to discuss the issues regarding support. I didn’t hide online, and I didn’t speak ill of them. I met with them, and we moved forward together. This organization was the CCFR, and I believe we now work very well together. I have since raised / donated many thousands of dollars in support of individual firearm owners and am part of the CCFR legal challenge for you the firearm owner.

    Wolverine Supplies has belonged to the CSSA, the NFA, the CCFR, and the CSAAA over many of our 34 years in business. My father John was the Manitoba President of the NFA for many years, and a director of the CSSA. My sister Danielle was a past board member of the CSAAA. Our family has spent countless hours advocating for your rights to own all types of firearms in Canada. It is disheartening when the moment something goes sideways, the comments that flow in are “I’ll never support them again”, “boycott them”, “only trying to make a quick buck”, the list gets worse and more personal from here. I ask each of you, “What have you done for firearms owners?” If you can honestly say you did everything you could, I congratulate you.

    As of today, I am stepping down as a director from the board of the CSAAA, I do not want to muddy the political and legal waters any further.

    I am an integral part of the CCFR’s legal challenge and fight for all Canadians’ rights to own firearms. Do I support the option for businesses to be compensated for non-saleable inventory, yes, I do as it sits today. However, this is a decision that may change. This is a decision for each individual business to make, not everyone else. Everyone is in a different financial situation. This compensation must be reasonable in nature, and I have my own questions for the CSAAA and will seek those answers in the weeks ahead.

    My continued focus, as always is to support all firearms owners; from the gopher shooter, IPSC competitor, big game hunter, trap shooter, to the next PRS champion. I have a business to run, employees to support and a family to champion and encourage along with trying to find time for some hunting and fishing.

    I encourage you to reach out to me with your concerns and as always Wolverine Supplies is here to support you.

    Regards,

    Matt Hipwell

  2. #2
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Joel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    7,248
    Wait for the facts and talk to you first? Not how extremists roll. Never miss an opportunity to tear each other apart.

    Sorry you caught so much flak over this and it has to suck. Thanks for all you guys have done.
    Slava Ukraini
    Beholden to neither left nor right, just calling the world as I see it
    "I literally just directly quoted your use of colour revolution techniques..."

  3. #3
    CGN Regular Mosin_redstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Eastern Ontario
    Posts
    136
    IMO it's great you have supported the industry for so long and thank you for that. But all actions have consequences. You can save 20 people from a burning building but if you help light one of those fires after the fact, then that is what people will remember unfortunately. I'm not hiding online I would go to your store and say the same thing in person but I'm several provinces away. An unfortunate series of events but all actions have consequences. And I fear that the long term repercussions of this deal with the libs was not thought out well enough before signing a deal.

  4. #4
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Joel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    7,248
    Quote Originally Posted by Mosin_redstar View Post
    IMO it's great you have supported the industry for so long and thank you for that. But all actions have consequences. You can save 20 people from a burning building but if you help light one of those fires after the fact, then that is what people will remember unfortunately. I'm not hiding online I would go to your store and say the same thing in person but I'm several provinces away. An unfortunate series of events but all actions have consequences. And I fear that the long term repercussions of this deal with the libs was not thought out well enough before signing a deal.
    What's the practical difference between this and if there had been no deal/contract though?

    I mean I get the symbolic win for the govt but whats the real world impact vs if this hadn't happened?
    Slava Ukraini
    Beholden to neither left nor right, just calling the world as I see it
    "I literally just directly quoted your use of colour revolution techniques..."

  5. #5
    CGN Regular 700-223's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Edmonton
    Posts
    402
    Thanks for what you and your family have done to support legal, responsible, firearms owners in Canada.

    The Liberals have managed to divide the gun community in Canada with this sideshow. When the government renders you unable to use, dispose of, and enjoy your property as you see fit they should reimburse you. https://apple.news/ACbu2UhlCRT61qDh-24HIFQ.

    The problem is the proposed changes in the law, the unjust OIC, and the politicization of public safety by the Liberals IMO. Let’s keep our focus on the real problem. Choosing to be reimbursed for property that you cannot sell is hardly unreasonable, immoral, or traitorous. Let’s keep the high ground in this debate and not vilify each other.
    Support safe firearms ownership in Canada! Donate to legal challenges to the OIC and join the CCFR. Write or call your MP, Mendicino, or the PM. Take a Mapleseed course with a novice or take a friend to the range.

    For sales on the EE, shipping to the majors included, payment by EMT, extra insurance at buyers discretion and expense. No trades unless mentioned in ad.

  6. #6
    CGN Regular Steve_B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by Joel View Post
    What's the practical difference between this and if there had been no deal/contract though?

    I mean I get the symbolic win for the govt but whats the real world impact vs if this hadn't happened?
    Symbolism is a real world impact.
    You might recall this whole thing is political theatre.
    CSSA and now - on Trudeau's recommendation - CCFR

  7. #7
    CGN Regular Steve_B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by 700-223 View Post
    The problem is the proposed changes in the law, the unjust OIC, and the politicization of public safety by the Liberals IMO. Choosing to be reimbursed for property that you cannot sell is hardly unreasonable, immoral, or traitorous.
    Unfortunately, if reimbursement is not unreasonable then the OIC is not unjust.
    You can't suck and blow at the same time.
    CSSA and now - on Trudeau's recommendation - CCFR

  8. #8
    CGN Regular b-wingpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sherwood Park
    Posts
    790
    Weak statement. He is part of the reason for the division. All gun owners were lock-step in solidarity for years, and the letter writing campaign helped to withdraw the amendments to C-21. This.....un-intelligent decision by the board of CSAAA sowed the seeds of division.

    BTW, is Wolverine Supplies still a member of the CSAAA?

  9. #9
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Joel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    7,248
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve_B View Post
    Symbolism is a real world impact.
    You might recall this whole thing is political theatre.
    That's just saying "it will" though. So can we articulate the actual harm that symbolism will cause, besides just saying it does?

    How will things now go differently than they would have?

    Quote Originally Posted by 700-223 View Post
    Thanks for what you and your family have done to support legal, responsible, firearms owners in Canada.

    The Liberals have managed to divide the gun community in Canada with this sideshow. When the government renders you unable to use, dispose of, and enjoy your property as you see fit they should reimburse you. https://apple.news/ACbu2UhlCRT61qDh-24HIFQ.

    The problem is the proposed changes in the law, the unjust OIC, and the politicization of public safety by the Liberals IMO. Let’s keep our focus on the real problem. Choosing to be reimbursed for property that you cannot sell is hardly unreasonable, immoral, or traitorous. Let’s keep the high ground in this debate and not vilify each other.
    100% agreed but in a place like this where people say worse about each other than the anti gunners say about us? That'll be the day.

    More purity tests, groupthink and dogma than I saw amongst the woke kids in Uni.
    Slava Ukraini
    Beholden to neither left nor right, just calling the world as I see it
    "I literally just directly quoted your use of colour revolution techniques..."

  10. #10
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,302
    The Liberal government took advantage of this and spewed their own version.
    The CSAAA could turn this around on the liberals through a media campaign of communicating the true cost of such a retailer/wholesaler buyback. They seem to be contracted to come up with dollar figures after all. Gotta make the taxpayers aware and angry enough. That is what ended up killing the long gun registry.

Page 1 of 24 1234567891121 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •