Wildlands 92 Tactical Lever-Action TD Rifle with Angle Eject 44MAG/16.5

[KaneZoR]

Any idea when you’ll be getting these in?

SKU: 920.434






https://www.chiappafirearms.com/prod...44mag-16-5-bbl

[taeish]

V cool. Would like that in 357

[unstableryan]

dammit, now I want one of those.

[Nismojunky]

o thats sexy

[Blygy]

V cool. Would like that in 357

ME too.

[jrusseller]

I’d take one in .44

[Dorian Gray]

I usually like the tactical lever guns. But that thing is an abortion if I've ever seen one. Makes the Mossberg 464 tactical look slick. I hope you guys like them and buy them all because they most definitely haven't found a customer in me with that thing.

[terez]

Concept is sound...however no front site is a big fail.

Should have a sturdy winged post front site on the barrel.....rear site can be optionally installed or sourced by the manufacturer or end user easily...but isnatlling a front site isnt so easy/affordable...it is entirely easy/affordable at time of manufacture

And a rifle of this type/caliber should have iron sites regardless if one chooses to mount an optic no discussion

[terez]

I think the forend configuration is a good design...even functionally handsome....the buttstock is fugly and snaggy

[RRH.01]

Wooof! Holy is this thing the dogs breakfast or what, throw every tactical feature you can think of and watch the call of duty kids rush in, #### load of useless mlok space on a hand guard so long and bloated it’s 50% taller than the rifle itself. Aside from maybe 1 or 2 slots out front for a light what are putting on a take down lever gun? The butt stocks fugly for sure, on top of no sights, high and bridged scope mounts and an absolute butchering of a 92 action. What are they going for with this? Starting to think we’re just around the corner from mlok on flintlocks I tell ya,
Edit: oh #### and only 2 grand, why the #### not eh! Mossberg level garbage with worse QC and quality. Sign me up for one!

Terez, your avatar picture is very disappointed in you right now haha