Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 44 vs 357 rossi r92

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    4

    44 vs 357 rossi r92

    Looking to get either a 44, or 357 rossi R92 lever action, to then take apart and add ranger point precision parts. Does anyone have any advice to what calibre they prefer, or any advice when building a lever action with ranger precision parts? Thank you. (third post!!!)

  2. #2
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer tokguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Buffalo Republic
    Posts
    6,599
    I had a 44 magnum Mare's Leg. It was lively if you didn't handload.
    357 would be interesting. I found them to be quite sharp as far as report...maybe the 12"+ barrel on a rifle would tame that down to reasonable levels.
    I ended up with a ML in 45 LC and love it. 14 K psi pressure is much nicer than 36+ K... just is IMO
    Of course my opinion and about 2$ will get you a coffee. Ain't worth much, lol
    Red Adair " arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig, you get all covered in s--t; and the only one who has any fun is the pig "

  3. #3
    CGN Regular frogger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    NW Ontario
    Posts
    324
    Depends what you want to do with it. Hunt / carry for bear protection or plink. I’ve had both in a trapper and still have the 44.

  4. #4
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    676
    The Rossi 1892 is a very light rifle, I guess full power 44 magnum will recoil like a 300 WIN Magnum in an average hunting bolt action rifle.

    I would go with the 357, less recoil, can shoot cheaper 38 special etc...

  5. #5
    CGN Regular frogger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    NW Ontario
    Posts
    324
    In my experience recoil would not should not be a big factor between the two. I find the Rossi 44mag w a 16” barrel recoils milder than a 30-30.

  6. #6
    Super GunNutz Grain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SW SK
    Posts
    1,404
    I've found 44 mag to be very mild in both 16 and 20" barrels, w/ full stocks. 357 ammo can be quite a bit cheaper however.
    Victory Formation

    "Somebody get a gun and shoot it! Doesn't anybody have a gun?" Jaws 1975
    A society grows great when men plant trees in whose shade they know they shall never sit.

  7. #7
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer tokguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Buffalo Republic
    Posts
    6,599
    Quote Originally Posted by frogger View Post
    In my experience recoil would not should not be a big factor between the two. I find the Rossi 44mag w a 16” barrel recoils milder than a 30-30.
    I found factory loads to be 'Sharp' with excessive muzzle blast in the 44 ML. It was much better with an appropriate load of 4227 and 200 gr.
    OP didn't stipulate what he was going to do with it. Bear protection...44 or 45.
    Plinking...357 is a great option. I don't know for sure but 38 special might cycle through it...that would be pleasant to shoot.
    Red Adair " arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig, you get all covered in s--t; and the only one who has any fun is the pig "

  8. #8
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer sgt.rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yellowknife, N.W.T.
    Posts
    5,090
    My 16" R92 in 357 is in my top 2 favorite all around utility guns.
    The short barrel can still get excellent velocities with handloads. I got an average of 2090 f/s with 125gr XTP and max loads of H110. My 158gr loads averaged 1790 f/s with H110 and my puff loads using power pistol and titegroup still got 1450 -1500 f/s with 158gr jacketed bullets. (Rem, Win, Speer)
    So much fun to shoot. Other than a peep sight, mine is bone stock. Never had a malfunction in hundreds of rounds. Mine is newer made on CNC machinery.
    My Grandfather always said " Kid...............if you meet more than one arsehole in a day, chances are you are the arsehole. "

  9. #9
    CGN frequent flyer RRH.01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Right near da beach
    Posts
    1,139
    Quote Originally Posted by partial View Post
    The Rossi 1892 is a very light rifle, I guess full power 44 magnum will recoil like a 300 WIN Magnum in an average hunting bolt action rifle.

    I would go with the 357, less recoil, can shoot cheaper 38 special etc...
    Nah, even in the ranch hand a load of w296 pushin 240gr is a pussycat to shoot even one handed. It’s loud but doesn’t recoil bad.

  10. #10
    GunNutz AlbertaJohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    West Central Alberta
    Posts
    1,486
    I recently bought a Rossi R92 in .454 Casull.

    Yes it's a light rifle and the recoil is a bit stout but not too bad.

    Hope to get a deer with it next season.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •