Freedom Ordnance FX-9 10inch Upper Receiver IN-STOCK

[Mcdonald1990]

Are these reliable?

[Bfranklin]

Here is section 92(1)(b)


So knowingly putting yourself in the possession of a restricted firearm that is not registered and does not have a registration certificate, is a problem.

Moving on to possessing a restricted firearm at a place other than your dwelling house that is not covered by your ATT, that’s this criminal offence.

Attachment 770257

I agree with your explanation of the above.

So, assuming you’re willing to argue in court that your deck is part of your dwelling (curtilage), you still have to get past loading and discharging your restricted firearm at a non s29 approved range.

The Firearms Act sets out the lawful purposes you may acquire -and continue to possess- a restricted firearm at sections 28 and 71(b). Should the CFO learn you are target shooting a restricted firearm at a place that is not a s29 approved range, they SHALL revoke the registration certificate for the firearm.

Attachment 770260Attachment 770261

That's not what it says, so I am not sure why you understand it that way. I do not agree with you at all, and I am very curious if there have ever been any charges brought against anyone for what you claim to be illegal.

[Paul_1982]

I agree with your explanation of the above.




That's not what it says, so I am not sure why you understand it that way. I do not agree with you at all, and I am very curious if there have ever been any charges brought against anyone for what you claim to be illegal.

There are no charges. They just revoke your certs.

[Bfranklin]

Curious if that has ever happened.

[Paul_1982]

Curious if that has ever happened.

Doubtful.

The number of people in Canada who a) own restricted firearms and B) live rural enough to safely discharge a firearm from an attached deck and c) is willing to take that risk, is very small. On top of that, being caught would be even less of a chance.

[AlphaCharlieDelta]

But there is still a chance however small...