yeah didn't want to go $2K crazy on a safe but i do like that browning af35 safe, that's cool...albeit out of my price range
yeah didn't want to go $2K crazy on a safe but i do like that browning af35 safe, that's cool...albeit out of my price range
There is a philosophy that going overboard creates a new "standard". For example, there are many threads on trigger-locking non restr when in transport. It's not required (lets not start that debate again here PLEASE!). So if all the police ever see is trigger-locked non restr in transport (assuming they're not necc familiar with FA regs) then that will become the expected standard of what's required. If they see non locked nonrestr and discover that's all that's required, then locked is over and above the standard.
Not sure I'm explaining what I mean, but to say if over and above is done often enough, then it becomes tha standard should explain it.
In the end, whatever you're comfortable with.
Depends. $2k to secure $900 worth of guns?
I'm rural as well, and have already been broken into (for those that don't know, it's as common or more common in the country than the city where they can work away for hours without anyone seeing, and they can usually hear/see someone coming home for a long distance) so I share your concern.
I installed a heavy security system, and happen to have a cabinet in a dedicated room (seperately alarmed so if I get a call stating that zone has been triggered I can get the cops there faster because firearms involved).
As I said above, in the end...whatever you're comfortable with.
You can keep your MP3 and your MP4.....
I want an MP5 !
Our legal system - guilty until rendered bankrupt
on sale at Canadian tire , 7 gun case $100
Get 2 put them in a closet
buy a brace of Trigger locks keyed alike ... maybe another $100
Save the soft cases for transport to the range.
There's legal minimum and there's reasonable care. The two aren't the same. I don't have kids, so it changes things somewhat, but I want to keep firearms out of unauthorized hands. As a responsible citizen, I want to make sure that my property doesn't cause someone else grief. Regardless of whether the law allows it, a portable hard case can be stolen too easily for my liking. Soft cases are far too easy to bust open on premises let alone remove from my home and open at their leisure. I would use either case for transport where I wouldn't be leaving it unattended.
I haven't received my PAL yet, so there's nothing inside, but I have a gun cabinet in a discreet yet accessible location in my home. A burglar ransacking my place could very well not even see it. It is fastened to the wall studs and floor joists, so it can't be moved. It is as secure as I can reasonably make it and it happens to satisfy the law.
P
Last edited by pubb; 09-09-2011 at 09:24 PM.
Just some FYI but I dont think there is any way you can say a zippered soft case fits the definition of not easily broken into.
[youtube]zMTXzQ0Vqn8[/youtube]
Shawn
never am i ever taking a suitcase let alone a softcase bag through an airport again...