Definitely a Nay for me. At that price point even if it were non-restricted it just doesn't appeal to me. I love tactical shotties but this one i'd pass on unless it were closer to the $600-$700 range.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Yay
Nay
Definitely a Nay for me. At that price point even if it were non-restricted it just doesn't appeal to me. I love tactical shotties but this one i'd pass on unless it were closer to the $600-$700 range.
Lol maybe there should be an instant pop-up when people log into cgn for the first 100 or so times with faqs about guns such as: accessory bull pup stocks are prohib, short barreled .22 rimfire rifles are not prohib, .375 Ruger munches butt; etc. :D
But I digress: there is scant info on the shotgun, it looks like a nice Bill Holmes design, but if it's that expensive, no, I would have to pass.
Last edited by fat tony; 11-13-2011 at 10:25 PM.
Yes...if non restricted
I voted Yes but only if non restricted
would be great for duck hunting faster re-load for more ducks
I second the screw in chokes.Originally Posted by heavenIsAlie
would be interested if it was more in the $600 price range
I voted yes, but only if its non restricted
93AAĜ1976
The British empire was an incredible achievement. It brought civilisation to the uncivilised.
Only if it's non-restricted (or we do away with ATTs).
"I like guns, I like the way they look,
I like the shiny steel and the polished wood.
I don´t care if they´re big or small,
if they´re for sale, hell, I want´em all!
I like guns, I like guns, I like guns!"
(Steve Lee)
Any updates?
It looks really cool but I don't think it is for me.
Posting Permissions
