Sorry to say but the .40 mags dont work in the 9mm versions. I have both and no go.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sorry to say but the .40 mags dont work in the 9mm versions. I have both and no go.
"A man is only as good as his word"
Any way to rebarrel the SAF's into Nonres? Possibly stick a fake can on the long barrel to resemble a suppressed MP5 kit type of deal?
Or is that just my imagination running wild.
The New King of Rant threads has arrived!
Spread the word... Gunslingr: saving the world, one rant thread at a time!
Anything is possible with sufficient capital. I personally think it would look silly like the BRS-99s because it's alot of barrel that needs to be added. The CT-40 is probably a better choice for a non-restricted carbine as it only needs an additional ~ 1/2" of barrel IIRC.