![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I understand that, but earlier in this thread someone had indicated that a dealer was looking to bring them in. I thought maybe someone had the inside track on a new development.
CQB, 3 Gun, ISSAC and Service Rifle Shooter.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - 1* - SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM - HAN SHOT FIRST - YOUR FREEDOM IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY
Its legal if you build the stock yourself.
It really isnt that hard.
Necro-thread alert!!! (sorry) What if someone designed a bullpup stock that had the sks dust-cover milled into it? That would make the stock an integral part of the rifle since the dust cover contains and retains the recoil spring and the rifle cannot be used without that dust cover in place.
Canada ended when Trudeau began.
It would have to be the receiver anyways, not some miscellaneous gun parts. Because what was banned in the law is a stock + firearm that makes a bullpup.
A bullpup stock with a SKS dust cover isn't a firearm. Because an SKS dust cover isn't a firearm.2 Any rifle, shotgun or carbine stock of the type known as the “bull-pup” design, being a stock that, when combined with a firearm, reduces the overall length of the firearm such that a substantial part of the reloading action or the magazine-well is located behind the trigger of the firearm when it is held in the normal firing position.
The reason why we have legal bullpup firearms in Canada is that the receiver of the firearm, is the stock too. Such as the tavor x95 and the T97, you can't remove the receiver from the stock because they are the same thing.