YAWN...Old news from 1916. He was an Italian BTW: Carmine A. Grieco
http://www.google.com/patents/US1202707
Seems they just couldn't let it go. 'Everything old, is new again.'
YAWN...Old news from 1916. He was an Italian BTW: Carmine A. Grieco
http://www.google.com/patents/US1202707
Seems they just couldn't let it go. 'Everything old, is new again.'
Stupidity is its own punishment.
“The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride,”
~Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy
Sure, but they pretty much have to be internally linked somehow, no? Otherwise, one barrel fires before the other, drags the slide out of battery, and a perfectly good unfired round is extracted from the chamber of barrel #2...
Timing would be everything with this unit.
I still can't tell you what it's for, aside from being awesome.
Grammar is like personal hygiene - you can ignore it if you like, but don't be surprised when people make assumptions about you.
Two triggers but one hammer...
my first thought was "who cares?", another twist on an old design, and overkill perhaps, but is it anymore over the top than a Desert Eagle in 50cal? more gun than most people need I guess, but to each his own, and its unusual enough that I would buy one...I wonder if the Mateba was considered superfluous when it came out in 1997? at the end of the day, wish I had bought ten of them!
"Heavy is good, heavy is reliable...if it doesn't work, you can always hit them with it"
-member of CSSA, NFA, OFAH, ATA, ODPL
What ever happened to 1x in each hand? LOL
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.
What about a delayed fire but the other side already pushed the action back that wouldn't be pretty
"Gun cabinet" - Henry H001, Cooey model 84 12 ga
What if one round expereinced a delayed fire, misfires, we could face an accident if it fires once ejected because the other fired round reloaded both barrels. Not a safe gun I would think. I don't want to be near it.