The T97 handles that void just fine for now. My friend loads his T97 with 10 round 223 pistol mags. Makes me want one Actually.
http://www.theammosource.com/index.p...96ddd9d296e489
The T97 handles that void just fine for now. My friend loads his T97 with 10 round 223 pistol mags. Makes me want one Actually.
http://www.theammosource.com/index.p...96ddd9d296e489
Have T97, Tavor, and Mossberg MVP varmint bolt gun. Have LAR pistol mags that work in all three. Got .223 covered, no need for .223 sks.
I bought the MVP only 2 weeks ago and haven't got it to the range yet. (worked the last two weekends) The price was good (565$) and I liked the features, ar style dm mag, adjustable trigger, etc.
I added a scope but no bipod as of yet. It is a bit heavy for steady standing shots and I was going to use a bench rest/bags and or bipod for gophers.
ah........nagh
7.62 x 39 SKS military surplus makes them of historical significance and also inexpensive as they are obsolete for the worlds armies but great for deer
the 223 sks is none of these things
imo
Please ban this account. I've been using it so long, with so many posts and information divulged, I suspect most anyone can tell who I am now. Do I still have my "reasonable expectation of privacy" with this account? Time to move on.
who would want to pay more to have an inferior caliber?
its not like cheap port were great target shooting gun or hunting rifle...
"when you have to shoot, shoot dont talk."
-the ugly
if anything from the com block id like to see a cz858(read non restricted) in .223 instead of just the cz58(restricted by barrel length) I don't know of any imported but ive seen a few that had the restricted barrel changed for a non restricted length barrel
So you want a non restricted vz 58 in .223? Because there is such a thing already they are made by CSA