View Poll Results: Which bullpup?!

Voters
1205. You may not vote on this poll
  • Type 97!

    320 26.56%
  • Tavor!

    767 63.65%
  • BOTH! The choice is impossible otherwise.

    118 9.79%
Page 10 of 20 FirstFirst ... 23456789101112131415161718 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 192

Thread: Battle of the bullpups! Type 97 vs Tavor... which is your pick?

  1. #91
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    28
    Like most western rifles, to much intricate parts. Saw videos of detail stripping of Tavor. To many fine machining that makes the Tavor expensive, To many screws and pins to keep the Tavor together. The T97 is based on the KISS system. Detail stripping of the T97 is simple and few components like the AK. Most components of the T97/QBZ-95 and AK are interlocking. Lots of videos of the T97/QBZ-95 reliability. The Tavor had issues before the Israeli army adopted it. The Tavor feels bulky and the T97 feels slim and trim. The T97 carries well and points well. That been said, I still love to own a Tavor.

  2. #92
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    28
    Like most western rifles, to much intricate parts. Saw videos of detail stripping of Tavor. To many fine machining that makes the Tavor expensive, To many screws and pins to keep the Tavor together. The T97 is based on the KISS system. Detail stripping of the T97 is simple and few components like the AK. Most components of the T97/QBZ-95 and AK are interlocking. Lots of videos of the T97/QBZ-95 reliability. The Tavor had issues before the Israeli army adopted it. The Tavor feels bulky and the T97 feels slim and trim. The T97 carries well and points well. The latest QBZ-95-1 have addressed the safety issue. Hope Norinco will incorporate the fixes to the T97 too. That been said, I still love to own a Tavor. The AKs are cheap too and most professional merc's prefer the AK.

  3. #93
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    217
    Think I saw a Chinese Parade on the Tele and the soldiers in the front were carrying the Type 97. Hard to beat. The Chinese are buying our debt and putting people out of business here though.

    Sigh!

  4. #94
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer H Wally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Canada/New Zealand
    Posts
    7,623
    Tavor - even being cheaper norcs have too many issues both ergonomically and mechanically. Their quality has come up but nowhere near the degree that it'd make me inclined to spend $1000 on one. Rather spend extra on a gun such as the tavor.

  5. #95
    CGN Regular triplepete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Posts
    801
    Bring in some Steyr AUGs and we'll talk!
    Practical Gun Nut is an Oxymoron

  6. #96
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer burnaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    5,301
    Ergonomics is very personal, comments indicates luv/hate for both rifles.

    Quality keeps coming up but with no specifics. Are these referencing build/reliability quality or aesthetics. For me goes bang every time is quality, don't fondle my guns so won't pay extra for shine/polish.

    As to China putting us out of business, did they do it to us or did we do it to ourselves. I'd pay 1.5x for a better quality T97 equivalent build in Canada BUT not holding my breath!!!
    Revolvers RULE; remember that next time you BEND over to pick up brass OR ejected brass pings off the precision gear.
    Looking for a car pool buddy for weekly weekday trips from Burnaby to POCO. Better yet I'll drive weekly and you take me hunting.

  7. #97
    CGN Regular triplepete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Posts
    801
    I have held a T97 at a shop and was very surprised how it felt. Felt better than some Kel-Tec stuff I held... definitely worth the $grand if it goes bang. I do like the Kel-tec RFB but it's a bit heavy.
    Practical Gun Nut is an Oxymoron

  8. #98
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer HeadDamage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    5,211
    There is nothing wrong with the quality of my T97.
    Remember remember early December
    Coalition, treason and plot.
    I see no reason why coalition, treason
    Should ever be forgot...

  9. #99
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer onetwentyish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    East Central AB (AKA Northern Texas)
    Posts
    6,875
    The only things wrong with the Tavor is the price and the weight of the trigger pull.

    The only things wrong with the T97 is:
    -poor iron sights
    -Non existent feed ramp results in bullets pushed deep inside of casings
    -Barrel gouge
    -difficult to mount sights to with out up-gradeing
    -poor mag release
    -no bolt release
    -terrible safety, which I find results in the safety not being used
    -poorly placed RECIPROCATING charging handle
    -odd ball commie muzzle threads
    -terrible mag compatibility
    -more difficult to field strip and put back together (more loose pieces)
    -no spare parts to be had
    -Not lefty compatible comfortably with out modification

    Thats just off the top of my head.
    I know there is much more.
    "I dont usually bring targets im more of a dirt shooter." -daniel_250r
    I am the "small fringe minority" with "unacceptable" views.
    CCFR 🍁 CSSA

  10. #100
    CGN Regular rocor98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    530
    Quote Originally Posted by onetwentyish View Post
    The only things wrong with the Tavor is the price and the weight of the trigger pull.

    The only things wrong with the T97 is:
    -poor iron sights
    -Non existent feed ramp results in bullets pushed deep inside of casings
    -Barrel gouge
    -difficult to mount sights to with out up-gradeing
    -poor mag release
    -no bolt release
    -terrible safety, which I find results in the safety not being used
    -poorly placed RECIPROCATING charging handle
    -odd ball commie muzzle threads
    -terrible mag compatibility
    -more difficult to field strip and put back together (more loose pieces)
    -no spare parts to be had
    -Not lefty compatible comfortably with out modification

    Thats just off the top of my head.
    I know there is much more.
    But look at all the $ you have to fix any of the problems on the exagerated list that really bother you ... the T97 is a workhorse not a safe queen :-)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •