![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
That would do the trick, not sure why didn't come to mind. Don't want to dim all way because clock is night time reference for rfid tag unlock.
These are great use them on tons of stuff
https://www.amazon.ca/LightDims-Orig...743371&sr=8-12
Also I have one of these safes and they are great
Shawn
Have you ever heard of "strict liability" and "absolute liability"?
The law:
86 (1) Every person commits an offence who, without lawful excuse, uses, carries, handles, ships, transports or stores a firearm, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons.
Contravention of storage regulations, etc.
(2) Every person commits an offence who contravenes a regulation made under paragraph 117(h) of the Firearms Act respecting the storage, handling, transportation, shipping, display, advertising and mail-order sales of firearms and restricted weapons.
Charges under 86(2) ("improper storage") are strict liability. There's no mention of "without lawful excuse", or "reasonable". It's like running a red light. You either did it or you didn't.
Hello folks, just received more of these.
Tesro Inc
Site Sponsor
Located in Ottawa Ontario - Contact us at info@tesro.ca for questions, appointments and order pick-ups
www.tesro.ca
facebook/tesroca
instagram.com/tesrocanada
Don't take this as legal advice, as I am not qualified to give you that. However, in case law in the past the courts ruled that a "safe" is a "safe" if its advertised as a safe and this definition is generally accepted. During the course of trial that set this precedence, evidence used to proof the safe is a safe (even if its clearly a flimsy box) was that the item in question, the safe, was traced back to the manufacture description in which the manufacture advertised that the item was a safe and therefore in the eyes of law it is a safe.
No it was not
It was ruled that if it is metal and locks its a safe under the firearms act. There is nothing about what it is sold as, marketed as or manufactured as a safe. In the case the "safe" in question was a modified school locker
Ruling was metal and locks, that's it
Shawn
So then there should be no problem with this “safe”.
1041hrs... princess should have been up hours ago doing PT, and cleaning his kit...