10-22 questions

THESEUS

THESEUS

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Location
saskatchewan
I have a Ruger 10-22 takedown that ive added the Magpul hunter stock, Volquartsen extractor and extended mag release and added the BX trigger.


I'm looking at switching out the Bolt to a Dlask version and Also the recoil buffer pin from stock to the nylon but if I do what difference/advantage would I be getting by spending another $140?
 
THESEUS said:
I have a Ruger 10-22 takedown that ive added the Magpul hunter stock, Volquartsen extractor and extended mag release and added the BX trigger.


I'm looking at switching out the Bolt to a Dlask version and Also the recoil buffer pin from stock to the nylon but if I do what difference/advantage would I be getting by spending another $140?
Click to expand...

The buffer pin won't do anything for accuracy. But I highly recommend it, as it makes the action more quiet and some claim that it saves your receiver from abuse. Plus it's only $5 or so. I have it on all my 10/22's.

As for the Dlask bolt, I'm not sure how much it improves accuracy/reliability. I have been running stock bolts with aftermarket extractors and it has been super reliable. Perhaps less than 1/100 FTF running the cheapest ammo I can find. Reliable enough for my purposes. And with a stock bolt and aftermarket barrel (Dlask Bull Barrel) I was getting half in groups at 50M, this is with my non takedown 10/22.

For me, I find that the aftermarket barrel was the cheapest upgrade for accuracy. However, there isn't much choices for Takedown barrels in Canada. If Dlask made an 8in TD Barrel, I would buy one in a heartbeat.
 
+1 on adding the buffer pin as the rifle cycles quieter and saves your receiver over time.
The factory bolt in the 10/22 really isn't a problem. I couldn't justify the upgrade if it was me, personally.
 
awesomealvin said:
The buffer pin won't do anything for accuracy. But I highly recommend it, as it makes the action more quiet and some claim that it saves your receiver from abuse. Plus it's only $5 or so. I have it on all my 10/22's.

As for the Dlask bolt, I'm not sure how much it improves accuracy/reliability. I have been running stock bolts with aftermarket extractors and it has been super reliable. Perhaps less than 1/100 FTF running the cheapest ammo I can find. Reliable enough for my purposes. And with a stock bolt and aftermarket barrel (Dlask Bull Barrel) I was getting half in groups at 50M, this is with my non takedown 10/22.

For me, I find that the aftermarket barrel was the cheapest upgrade for accuracy. However, there isn't much choices for Takedown barrels in Canada. If Dlask made an 8in TD Barrel, I would buy one in a heartbeat.
Click to expand...

What... you think we’re made of money?! :p

For the TRUE cheapskate (your’s truly) just get a 6mm nylon knitting needle at the dollar store. They come in a 2-pack, and each needle will make 5 pins. That’s FIFTY pins for the price of just one of Spendy McSpenderson’s up there ^ :p

You can sell the 49 left overs for $4 a pop, and use the proceeds to buy the bolt you want!
 
I'd go with the buffer, it will help cut down on wear and tear, prolonging the life of the rifle, the new bolt won't do much at all that the stock bolt doesn't do. Put your money into a good barrel if you want the best dollar value.
 
THESEUS said:
I have a Ruger 10-22 takedown that ive added the Magpul hunter stock, Volquartsen extractor and extended mag release and added the BX trigger.


I'm looking at switching out the Bolt to a Dlask version and Also the recoil buffer pin from stock to the nylon but if I do what difference/advantage would I be getting by spending another $140?
Click to expand...

I bought the DLASK receiver w barrel (DAR22) and ordered a kit from Brownells (780-001-458 RUGER 10/22 RECEIVER PARTS KIT) I lucked out in that the kit was on sale for $99 and so fell under the 100 limit for extra customs papers. At any rate.. this could be an option for your bolt/buffer requirements.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom