I doubt it, I think they'd have to produce the pistol in that calibre for it to be legal - part of the legislation says it must be "produced for a pistol which is commonly available in Canada." As far asI know the LAR-15 isn't available in 6.5 or 6.8 (YET)
The 10 round LAR-15 magazine is legal in Canada because it is designed for a .223 pistol.
Would it still be legal if I replaced the follower with one suitable for the 6.5 mm Grendel or the 6.8 mm Remington SPC?
The follower stuff won't work, the magazine geometry is different when speaking of these larger caliber. Just look at the ribs at the rear of the mag body, on the 6.5/6.8 they are much less deep to accomodate the larger size of the rounds... Otherwise the body just deform when loading a certain number of cartridges.
But, the mag may work, but may be not at full capacity; It won't matter how many rounds you stuff in it in whatever caliber (provided that it still works). The magazine is made for the LAR-15 pistol. If it feeds in a 6.8 barret m468, who cares ? The mag is made for the LAR-15 pistol, I press on this because thats what the laws says, not in which firearm it is used in. Thats also why we can use it in another gun that the LAR-15 pistol![]()
Not even close.Sorry to ask what is probably a simple question to most of you, but here goes:
Do all the various mags (.223/5.56, 9 mm, .308/7.62x51, 6.5, 6.8) fit into the same lower (magazine well)?
You may well be right - I forgot, the people who wrote the law knew nothing about firearms - I'd hate to find out you were wrong though.
How could I be wrong on this case, the RCMP approved it and cited the reason on which they based their decision. It is made for the LAR-15 pistol which is .223; it won't feed 6.8 in the same weapon for obvious reasons. If it feeds the same 6.8 ammo in a different gun so what ? The magazine has been approved for what it is stamped on on the body.
The only thing we need is a special edition LAR-15 in 6.8![]()