Here is my newest SVT Sniper. 1942 Tula, Refurb, with AVT stock, Non-Import marked.
We have talked a bit about these snipers and especially the "C" marking or lack of "C" marking.
This one has the "C" markings on the top receiver groove, rear site, and left forearm of the stock.
As noted many of the Import marked SVT snipers lack these "C" markings.
I had a previous theory that the non-"C" marked rifles were either 'armour replacements' or clever fakes.
Now I have a new theory. Why would an AVT stock be marked with a "C" on a post war rifle? Maybe the "C" marked rifles are fakes? Or perhaps the "C" markings were added during the refurb process, identifying sniper rifles.
It is true that Tula 91/30's have these "C" markings. But do we know for sure that they were applied during the war? Or possibly post war?
We would need a 'capture' sniper with or without "C" markings to support any of these theories.
Thoughts????
We have talked a bit about these snipers and especially the "C" marking or lack of "C" marking.
This one has the "C" markings on the top receiver groove, rear site, and left forearm of the stock.
As noted many of the Import marked SVT snipers lack these "C" markings.
I had a previous theory that the non-"C" marked rifles were either 'armour replacements' or clever fakes.
Now I have a new theory. Why would an AVT stock be marked with a "C" on a post war rifle? Maybe the "C" marked rifles are fakes? Or perhaps the "C" markings were added during the refurb process, identifying sniper rifles.
It is true that Tula 91/30's have these "C" markings. But do we know for sure that they were applied during the war? Or possibly post war?
We would need a 'capture' sniper with or without "C" markings to support any of these theories.
Thoughts????




















































