.......

BioPace said:
Your scope mount is on backwards - and it should be attached to the receiver, not the handguard.
Click to expand...

Cantilever mounts can go either way if 0 moa but I agree with moving it off the handguard and in this case since its a bigger scope turning the mount around would help with eye relief.

Either way a good looking rifle, just finished mine too.
 
Mumbles Marble Mouth said:
I thought these things got hit with the Alberta Tactical MS. What did I miss? Fill me in please.
Click to expand...
ATRS did not get hit by the OIC.
It’s FRT was changed later by the RCMP after the fact. But as the FRT is not law, these are not prohibited.

There is no case law set to see what will happen if found using one, as it will be up to the interpretation of the officer you come across. Albeit, the case is pretty sound that one wouldn’t be convicted, as the RCMP even admit the FRT is not law.

However, the fight to prove your innocence would likely be costly and time consuming.

Many have opted to take the risk, as our freedoms keep getting eroded away. And fake laws implemented as real complete and utter bull####
 
koesdibyo said:
ATRS did not get hit by the OIC.
It’s FRT was changed later by the RCMP after the fact. But as the FRT is not law, these are not prohibited.

There is no case law set to see what will happen if found using one, as it will be up to the interpretation of the officer you come across. Albeit, the case is pretty sound that one wouldn’t be convicted, as the RCMP even admit the FRT is not law.

However, the fight to prove your innocence would likely be costly and time consuming.

Many have opted to take the risk, as our freedoms keep getting eroded away. And fake laws implemented as real complete and utter bull####
Click to expand...

This! I shoot my ATRS MS and SAI TR and if the RCMP prosecute, I'm willing to take on the fight. We actually do need someone to fight back against the RCMP and the ATRS MS is an easy one since the RCMP broke their rules by changing the FRT more than 12 months after issuing it is my understanding. In addition to that, I'm not aware of any legal definition of a firearms 'variant' in Canada yet its used in the OIC.
 
koesdibyo said:
ATRS did not get hit by the OIC.
It’s FRT was changed later by the RCMP after the fact. But as the FRT is not law, these are not prohibited.

There is no case law set to see what will happen if found using one, as it will be up to the interpretation of the officer you come across. Albeit, the case is pretty sound that one wouldn’t be convicted, as the RCMP even admit the FRT is not law.

However, the fight to prove your innocence would likely be costly and time consuming.

Many have opted to take the risk, as our freedoms keep getting eroded away. And fake laws implemented as real complete and utter bull####
Click to expand...

Well put.
 
koesdibyo said:
ATRS did not get hit by the OIC.
It’s FRT was changed later by the RCMP after the fact. But as the FRT is not law, these are not prohibited.

There is no case law set to see what will happen if found using one, as it will be up to the interpretation of the officer you come across. Albeit, the case is pretty sound that one wouldn’t be convicted, as the RCMP even admit the FRT is not law.

However, the fight to prove your innocence would likely be costly and time consuming.

Many have opted to take the risk, as our freedoms keep getting eroded away. And fake laws implemented as real complete and utter bull####
Click to expand...

Yes sir !

I especially love the RCMP bulletin that ATRS includes with every purchase, classic RCMP political corruption
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom