22 Hornet ammo is outrageously expensive.
$100-$125/50.
Most people shooting it treat it like it's rimfire ammunition, because of the low recoil.
It's much more expensive than comparable 223rem .
It used to be cheap, but it's a very old cartridge, and newer 22 cal rounds easily outstrip it.
I have a Ruger 77/22 Hornet, and like it a lot.
I have a lot of brass and bullets for it. It prefers 40-50 grain bullets with flat bases.
It's never been in the "tack driver" category, but it's accurate enough for what I use it for, which is mainly Raccoons and the odd Coyote that's brazen enough to come into my yard to check out my dogs.
I've tried a lot of things to get it to shoot better, but it wears a Wilson barrel, which in this case seems to be one of the problematic ones that created a lot of negativity for Ruger. Most Wilson barrels are just fine, but they dropped the ball with many of those they sold to Ruger.
I could rebarrel it, but ????????????
My handloads with 12 grains of Lil Gun, over CCI400 primers, under 40gr VMax, seated to just fit into the rotary magazines, give just over 2800fps
The Vmax is long for weight and inhibits powder capacity. This is a compressed load, which is what Lil Gun needs.
45 grain Speer Flat nose/base, works best with 9.6 grn of W296, over CCI 400 primers, giving 2575 fps.
9.8 grains of H110, over CCI 400 primers, works best with 50 grain bullets of all types, with just over 2500fps.
Lil Gun powder can quite easily fit the bill as a "one powder fits all," for the 22 Hornet.
It's a great little cartridge, but IMHO, it's not even close to being an ethical "Deer cartridge."
Even on the very small Haida Gwai Black Tails, it's minimal at best, and shots should be under 75 yards.





















































