.223 Wylde info

srk

New member
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Hi
In the process of building an upper for my AR15.
I did some digging on Wikipedia about the .223 Wylde
But i am confused about the brass.
Is there designated brass/dies for the Wylde?
Or just use regular .223 brass?
Does/can someone please elaborate more on this for me please?
Thanks!
 
.223 Wylde is a compromise between .223 and 5.56 NATO chamberings, both .223 and 5.56 NATO use the same brass with a different throat profile allowing 5.56 to be loaded slightly hotter. So yes, they all use the same brass, and in most cases can use the same loads.
 
The Wylde chamber was designed specifically for Canadian C77 IVI 5.56 ammo. Its designer used to shoot matches up here when it was given out and you had to use it. It wil fire both 5.56 and 223 ammo just fine.

If you Google 223 Wylde, you can find a lot of old posts by Bill Wylde on various forums talking about its development:

Posted By: Bill Wylde
Date: Thursday, 13 November 2003, at 8:46 a.m.

In Response To: Re: .223 Wylde

The case dimensions of the Wylde reamer are that of one of the NATO prints. Not a thing tight about it. As I recall, there were two NATO prints in use. I don't recall the print number used, but do have it in old records somewhere.

Throating was about the only change. The decision was made to make the freebore diameter .2240" as a good bullet seal. That done, excess freebore made little difference to accuracy. One of the reasons the magazine length 69's shot so well in the chamber. It so happened that the 80 grain Sierra seated to the lands was about ideal at .2470" OAL. Simple luck.....All of it.

The initial reamer(designed in 1984)was mainly geared toward Canadian 5.56 ball, as I was experimenting with their issue ball for competitive purposes. This operation was slow in getting off the ground, and really didn't start happening until about 1990. The use of 5.56 NATO ball in Canada was a short lived affair. Handloads were allowed in about 1994.

Just prior to this time the AR's were gaining great strength in the U.S. The military finally got involved. The rest is history.

You might ask how the the 62 grain 5.56 ball worked for Canadian LR prone shooting to 1,000 yds? It was supersonic in barrels of 28", and longer. It also was very competitive with the 147 grain 7.62 ball in use there at the time. The wind drift differential at long range (7.62/5.56) was about 15% in favor of the 7.62.

Those days were very interesting.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom