.22LR Ballistics Website
- Thread starter Broker
- Start date
JBM now has a lot of models for .22 LR projectiles.
http://www.jbmballistics.com/
I would trust it more than anything else. Plus, you can customize the velocity to what your are getting in your particular barrel.
http://www.jbmballistics.com/
I would trust it more than anything else. Plus, you can customize the velocity to what your are getting in your particular barrel.
Ballistics for CCI .22LR Stinger from JBM
Lots of experience with handguns, big game rifles, ARs and shotguns. Never had much use for .22 LR until now. I'm going to try some gopher shooting.
I've sighted my new Savage Mark II BV .22LR rifle and Leupold VX1 scope to be right on at 50 metres with Federal Gold Medal and Winchester Target ammo. CCI Stinger ammo hits about 2 inches high at 50 metres. According to the JBM Calculator it should be in the 2 inch kill zone for gophers out to 120 metres. The Stingers are what I want to use on gophers.
Does this make sense to you experts?
Calculated Table
Range Drop Drop Windage Windage Velocity Mach Energy Time Lead Lead
(yd) (in) (MOA) (in) (MOA) (ft/s) (none) (ft•lbs) (s) (in) (MOA)
0 -1.5 *** 0.0 *** 1662.0 1.489 196.2 0.000 0.0 ***
10 -0.5 -4.8 0.1 0.6 1596.7 1.430 181.1 0.018 0.0 0.0
20 0.4 1.7 0.3 1.3 1533.8 1.374 167.1 0.038 0.0 0.0
30 1.1 3.4 0.6 1.9 1473.3 1.320 154.2 0.058 0.0 0.0
40 1.6 3.9 1.1 2.6 1415.6 1.268 142.4 0.078 0.0 0.0
50 2.0 3.8 1.7 3.3 1360.9 1.219 131.6 0.100 0.0 0.0
60 2.2 3.5 2.5 4.0 1309.2 1.173 121.8 0.122 0.0 0.0
70 2.2 3.0 3.4 4.7 1260.9 1.129 113.0 0.146 0.0 0.0
80 1.9 2.3 4.5 5.4 1216.2 1.089 105.1 0.170 0.0 0.0
90 1.5 1.6 5.7 6.1 1175.3 1.053 98.1 0.195 0.0 0.0
100 0.8 0.7 7.1 6.8 1138.4 1.020 92.1 0.221 0.0 0.0
110 -0.2 -0.2 8.7 7.5 1105.2 0.990 86.8 0.248 0.0 0.0
120 -1.5 -1.2 10.3 8.2 1075.6 0.963 82.2 0.275 0.0 0.0
130 -3.1 -2.2 12.1 8.9 1049.2 0.940 78.2 0.304 0.0 0.0
140 -4.9 -3.4 14.0 9.6 1025.3 0.918 74.7 0.332 0.0 0.0
150 -7.2 -4.6 16.1 10.2 1003.6 0.899 71.6 0.362 0.0 0.0
02/04/10 12:52, JBM/jbmtraj-5.0.cgi
It would probably be better with a 50 metre zero 1 inch high.
That would give this:
Range Drop Drop Windage Windage Velocity Mach Energy Time Lead Lead
(yd) (in) (MOA) (in) (MOA) (ft/s) (none) (ft•lbs) (s) (in) (MOA)
0 -1.5 *** 0.0 *** 1662.0 1.489 196.2 0.000 0.0 ***
10 -0.7 -6.7 0.1 0.6 1596.7 1.430 181.1 0.018 0.0 0.0
20 -0.0 -0.2 0.3 1.3 1533.8 1.374 167.1 0.038 0.0 0.0
30 0.5 1.5 0.6 1.9 1473.3 1.320 154.2 0.058 0.0 0.0
40 0.8 2.0 1.1 2.6 1415.6 1.268 142.4 0.078 0.0 0.0
50 1.0 1.9 1.7 3.3 1360.9 1.219 131.6 0.100 0.0 0.0
60 1.0 1.6 2.5 4.0 1309.2 1.173 121.8 0.122 0.0 0.0
70 0.8 1.1 3.4 4.7 1260.9 1.129 113.0 0.146 0.0 0.0
80 0.3 0.4 4.5 5.4 1216.2 1.089 105.1 0.170 0.0 0.0
90 -0.3 -0.3 5.7 6.1 1175.3 1.053 98.1 0.195 0.0 0.0
100 -1.2 -1.2 7.1 6.8 1138.4 1.020 92.1 0.221 0.0 0.0
110 -2.4 -2.1 8.7 7.5 1105.2 0.990 86.8 0.248 0.0 0.0
120 -3.9 -3.1 10.3 8.2 1075.6 0.963 82.2 0.275 0.0 0.0
It would give me a maximum of about an inch high or low out to 100 yards.
Lots of experience with handguns, big game rifles, ARs and shotguns. Never had much use for .22 LR until now. I'm going to try some gopher shooting.
I've sighted my new Savage Mark II BV .22LR rifle and Leupold VX1 scope to be right on at 50 metres with Federal Gold Medal and Winchester Target ammo. CCI Stinger ammo hits about 2 inches high at 50 metres. According to the JBM Calculator it should be in the 2 inch kill zone for gophers out to 120 metres. The Stingers are what I want to use on gophers.
Does this make sense to you experts?
Calculated Table
Range Drop Drop Windage Windage Velocity Mach Energy Time Lead Lead
(yd) (in) (MOA) (in) (MOA) (ft/s) (none) (ft•lbs) (s) (in) (MOA)
0 -1.5 *** 0.0 *** 1662.0 1.489 196.2 0.000 0.0 ***
10 -0.5 -4.8 0.1 0.6 1596.7 1.430 181.1 0.018 0.0 0.0
20 0.4 1.7 0.3 1.3 1533.8 1.374 167.1 0.038 0.0 0.0
30 1.1 3.4 0.6 1.9 1473.3 1.320 154.2 0.058 0.0 0.0
40 1.6 3.9 1.1 2.6 1415.6 1.268 142.4 0.078 0.0 0.0
50 2.0 3.8 1.7 3.3 1360.9 1.219 131.6 0.100 0.0 0.0
60 2.2 3.5 2.5 4.0 1309.2 1.173 121.8 0.122 0.0 0.0
70 2.2 3.0 3.4 4.7 1260.9 1.129 113.0 0.146 0.0 0.0
80 1.9 2.3 4.5 5.4 1216.2 1.089 105.1 0.170 0.0 0.0
90 1.5 1.6 5.7 6.1 1175.3 1.053 98.1 0.195 0.0 0.0
100 0.8 0.7 7.1 6.8 1138.4 1.020 92.1 0.221 0.0 0.0
110 -0.2 -0.2 8.7 7.5 1105.2 0.990 86.8 0.248 0.0 0.0
120 -1.5 -1.2 10.3 8.2 1075.6 0.963 82.2 0.275 0.0 0.0
130 -3.1 -2.2 12.1 8.9 1049.2 0.940 78.2 0.304 0.0 0.0
140 -4.9 -3.4 14.0 9.6 1025.3 0.918 74.7 0.332 0.0 0.0
150 -7.2 -4.6 16.1 10.2 1003.6 0.899 71.6 0.362 0.0 0.0
02/04/10 12:52, JBM/jbmtraj-5.0.cgi
It would probably be better with a 50 metre zero 1 inch high.
That would give this:
Range Drop Drop Windage Windage Velocity Mach Energy Time Lead Lead
(yd) (in) (MOA) (in) (MOA) (ft/s) (none) (ft•lbs) (s) (in) (MOA)
0 -1.5 *** 0.0 *** 1662.0 1.489 196.2 0.000 0.0 ***
10 -0.7 -6.7 0.1 0.6 1596.7 1.430 181.1 0.018 0.0 0.0
20 -0.0 -0.2 0.3 1.3 1533.8 1.374 167.1 0.038 0.0 0.0
30 0.5 1.5 0.6 1.9 1473.3 1.320 154.2 0.058 0.0 0.0
40 0.8 2.0 1.1 2.6 1415.6 1.268 142.4 0.078 0.0 0.0
50 1.0 1.9 1.7 3.3 1360.9 1.219 131.6 0.100 0.0 0.0
60 1.0 1.6 2.5 4.0 1309.2 1.173 121.8 0.122 0.0 0.0
70 0.8 1.1 3.4 4.7 1260.9 1.129 113.0 0.146 0.0 0.0
80 0.3 0.4 4.5 5.4 1216.2 1.089 105.1 0.170 0.0 0.0
90 -0.3 -0.3 5.7 6.1 1175.3 1.053 98.1 0.195 0.0 0.0
100 -1.2 -1.2 7.1 6.8 1138.4 1.020 92.1 0.221 0.0 0.0
110 -2.4 -2.1 8.7 7.5 1105.2 0.990 86.8 0.248 0.0 0.0
120 -3.9 -3.1 10.3 8.2 1075.6 0.963 82.2 0.275 0.0 0.0
It would give me a maximum of about an inch high or low out to 100 yards.
Last edited:
