- Location
- Somewhere on the Hudson Bay Coast
In most ways if every caliber under .277 ceased to exist it wouldn't change my life much. My nature tends towards using a little extra and not having to wonder whether I have enough. I remember when I got my first .270 as a youngster and prying open that box of Imperials. I can still remember that sinking feeling when I thought those skinny bullets could never kill anything like a .30 cal. Those misgivings went away, just on observed field results.
The line between .257 and .264 bullets is only 7 thousandths of an inch. There's a considerable overlap in bullet weights that have BG applications. My own .25 and 6.5 examples of .257 Weatherby and .264 Win Mag are so similar that if it weren't for the Weatherby shoulder it would be hard to tell the cases apart. With the same case, similar velocities and potentially the same bullet weights there just isn't going to be huge difference in the field over 7 thousands of an inch. My own arbitrary line is drawn at 6mm, the point where my observations show a decided drop off in killing speed.
Observation tells me that there isn't a great deal of difference between a 25 caliber through .338 cal TSX when it comes time to kill things. Although I'm on record as being less than enthused with TSXs as a type they are remarkably similar to each other when they hit. It wouldn't surprise me much if your friend did all his hunting with that 100 grain without problem.
My logic, or lack of it, for making the 6.5 my minimum isn't the additional .007" diameter overe the .257, its the additional 20-40 grs of bullet weight which to me is a critical factor. But as you pointed out, my pal has no trouble with those dinky lil 100 gr pills, never mind 117 or 120 gr bullets.





















































