If it has less energy wouldnt it kick less? Was your answer a yes to the 257 kicks less?I'm sure it dose. the Vanguard weighs a pound more tahn the Tikka, and the 7mm mag develops less energy than the 257.
Ted
I'm sure it dose. the Vanguard weighs a pound more tahn the Tikka, and the 7mm mag develops less energy than the 257.
If it has less energy wouldnt it kick less? Was your answer a yes to the 257 kicks less?
The 7mmremmag actually develops more energy than the 257wby.

A lot less recoil than the 7mm.... and less than a 270. A very comfortable "Magnum" to shoot.
When I shot the two Vanguards, 120gr 257 and 150gr 270 win, the 270 kicked more.If you are comparing 120 and 130 grs together, than yeah, probably slightly more with the 257.
While I really like the 257 and think the caliber is ultra cool, in reality, I think the 270 win or the 270WSM is more versitile when going for an all around rifle. Due the the ability to load heavier bullets.
Hopefully they will be eating 9mm magsTo me the 257wby is a great cartridge for game up to 500lbs or so,but I don't think of it as an all around big game cartridge.For larger game such as elk or moose, I prefer at least a .284" bullet.
I was intending on using the 257 mag as a practice/antelope gun as the 300 win mag at the range is painful after 2-3 boxes.I know I'm going in a contrary direction on this one, but since I do actually own a Vanguard in .257 Weatherby Mag, I have to say that it does have more recoil than I was expecting. Compared to my HS Precision PHR in .270 Win (a rifle of essentially the same weight), the .257 is definitely the harder kicker -- no question about it.
Clearly, the reason has got to be differences in stock design and the personal idiosyncracies of stock-to-body fit. Which just goes to show how big a role a well-fit rifle plays in reducing the overall recoil experience...




























