Amphibious said:
bullet testing on steel plate is retarded.
my .22-250 makes holes in steel plate but my .450 marlin does not.
guess that mean my .22-250 is a better moose gun. after all it made more of a mess of the steel gong.
Made more of a mess on the steel gong? you missed the mess you were looking for (obviously)
Your 22-250 would weld a 3/8s hole through the metal, but your marlin turns it into a satelite dish after 6 shots... Your 22-250 didnt move the plate, but the 450 had it swinging for 5 minutes...
Now which is more effective?
walksalot said:
But the fact of the matter is, if I am reading your post correctly, you have already tried it.
Exactly... But couldnt figure it out, so its retarded

Its about reactive targets at long range first and foremost...
I'd rather puch a steel target at 3-400 yards than a paper target...
But it gives you a good perspective of the bullet/load your shooting...
Having fired about 20 different calibers into steel with numerous different bullet types, I'd say that it gives you a good perspective on how your bullet will hold together in a worst case scenario. Penetration testing is just as moot, but some use newspaper, wood, old meatbins etc...
To each his own, but none is an exact science unless you use ballistic gelatin (of varying percentages for the different muscle/organ consistencies), and real bone...
Walks, it gives you a good perspective of what your 06 can do with non premium loads... now try a partition, and an X... I bet the holes are twice the size with a bigger splash...
Weld a chain to one end, and try to hit it swinging
