Ok I have seen this discussion before and until recently I was satisfied with it, but...
Next week-end is the begining of deer season (gun) where I intend to hunt for the very first time. I have done some armed hiking and birdwatching (Grouse and Canada Geese) but never actually shot anything alive.
Since I'm a complete noob to this I try finding experienced hunters around me and luckily I got my best friend's father, who has been hunting pretty much every day he didn't work in hunting season for the past 35 years, to help me out. He was so happy to help in fact that he helped me set up sevral potential site to hunt.
At this point you might say, well what's his problem?
I was there the other day myself to help out, and to try my luck at some grouse, and we had a conversation with him and his longtime hunting partner (even more experience)
They booth think the gun I'm intending to take there next week is whooly unadequate.
I have a single shot 30-30 (Savage 219) that was gracefully offer to me by a member of this forum, and that was very welcome as I'm in a very tight situation now.
So until last week I was pretty confident in this as I belived that once you fired once everything else is history and because I was under the impression that 30-30 had killed a lot (if not most) of north american deer.
Now their argument can be pretty much summed up into : we used to wounded a lot of deer (or kill them and not recover them) back in the days with 30-30 and we're still ashamed from this to this day, but we didn't had more appropriate tools back then.
Some word about the land: it's very dense wood and I'll be dammed it I can see (let alone take a shot) at more than 75 yards.
I'm not a sure shot (first year) but I can definatly put it on a 8 1/2 x 11 target at 100 yards.
So do you guys think it's foolish of me to go there with my single shot 30-30?
Next week-end is the begining of deer season (gun) where I intend to hunt for the very first time. I have done some armed hiking and birdwatching (Grouse and Canada Geese) but never actually shot anything alive.
Since I'm a complete noob to this I try finding experienced hunters around me and luckily I got my best friend's father, who has been hunting pretty much every day he didn't work in hunting season for the past 35 years, to help me out. He was so happy to help in fact that he helped me set up sevral potential site to hunt.
At this point you might say, well what's his problem?
I was there the other day myself to help out, and to try my luck at some grouse, and we had a conversation with him and his longtime hunting partner (even more experience)
They booth think the gun I'm intending to take there next week is whooly unadequate.
I have a single shot 30-30 (Savage 219) that was gracefully offer to me by a member of this forum, and that was very welcome as I'm in a very tight situation now.
So until last week I was pretty confident in this as I belived that once you fired once everything else is history and because I was under the impression that 30-30 had killed a lot (if not most) of north american deer.
Now their argument can be pretty much summed up into : we used to wounded a lot of deer (or kill them and not recover them) back in the days with 30-30 and we're still ashamed from this to this day, but we didn't had more appropriate tools back then.
Some word about the land: it's very dense wood and I'll be dammed it I can see (let alone take a shot) at more than 75 yards.
I'm not a sure shot (first year) but I can definatly put it on a 8 1/2 x 11 target at 100 yards.
So do you guys think it's foolish of me to go there with my single shot 30-30?




























this particular debate is nothing new. caliber size means nothing if you can`t put your bullet in the kill zone.






















