303 bear or moose stopper

[X-man]

Only legal alternative I can see is for you to Borrow Gatehouse's Spear? :wink: If it'll stop a charging Bear, it should work for Moose! :mrgreen:

 

[John Y Cannuck]

I can't find the reg that sunray is refering to about being considered hunting, it used to be in the reg booklet, now it seems to be gone. I bet the reg is still there though.

did some digging, here it is in all it's glory.

Ontario Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act. (1997)

109. In a prosecution under this Act in respect of hunting or trapping,

(a) proof that a person possessed, in an area usually inhabited by wildlife, a firearm, trap, decoy or other hunting or trapping device, a ferret or a specially protected raptor or other bird of prey, is proof, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the person was hunting or trapping, as the case may be; and

(b) proof that a person shot at or stalked a decoy or other device placed by a conservation officer to suggest the presence of wildlife is proof, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the person was hunting. 1997, c. 41, s. 109.

 

[desporterizer]

I wonder what"evidence to the contrary" is. Ok then how about a battle axe & a chain male suit.

 

[Gibbs505]

What happened to "innocient untill proven guilty?"

 

[TheTooner]

"Evidence to the contrary" could be the accused or witnesses stating that he/she wasn't hunting, if the court chose to believe the statements, but that "if" is too big for my liking.

 

[Gibbs505]

but that "if" is too big for my liking.

And for mine, charter challenge anyone! :?: :?: