What there to be careful about? You build a gun and send it to me. I build a can and experiment with it. Then when I've had my way with your stuff I send it back ... and keep the can.
416 Hush Puppy
- Thread starter Suputin
- Start date
What there to be careful about? You build a gun and send it to me. I build a can and experiment with it. Then when I've had my way with your stuff I send it back ... and keep the can.
Are you referring to 7.62x39 or 7.62x51?
If 7.62x51, that's a different story - the entire bolt is much larger, not to mention the entire receiver, etc.
If 7.62x39, what interest? Those are not exactly in hot demand, apart from a niche.
Fine. I did state I was not sure of the mag. That aside, my other point
Nobody mentioned .300 BLK having a flat trajectory. Which is exactly my point. The post (yours) I was replying to asked why there was so much "hate" for this round, given all the love for the .300 BLK. Part of the answer lies in the ridiculous marketing terminology. These guys are mentioning "flat trajectory" in describing their round, while AAC is not using that term when describing theirs. To me, and others, that speaks a little bit to the integrity of the manufacturer.
So, I would suggest you look up non-sequitur, in order to see how it doesn't apply whatsoever in this case.
You guys are taking this out of context. It is a flat shooting round……for a subsonic cartridge. It's not being compared to a 5.56 or something, it's being compared to other subsonic cartridges. In this light it fares very well for a "flat trajectory".
