7 Mystic Range Report w/ Pics

Mystic Precision

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 99.9%
1082   1   1
Location
Summerland, BC
The purpose of this project was to:

1) Use a 7mm 9twist, fluted Shilen SS Select match heavy barrel with muzzle brake on a switch barrel Savage action. Show that this system and a properly machined barrel can provide match accuracy.

2) Use up my stash of '06 brass.

3) Create a wildcat that does not need custom dies, nor reamer (the 280AI reamer that many gunsmiths have will work. Either 35 or 40deg shoulder is fine).

4) Reach standard 7RM/WSM/RSAUM performance in a 24" barrel and use less powder to do that. Bullet of choice would be the 162gr Amax as I want this to be my 1000m 10lbs class rifle. So target velocity would be 2950fps or faster without excessive pressure.

5) Prove that matching a powder to case volume/bore/bullet is what determines so call 'effeciencies', not case shape. Pressures would be held to conventional pressure signs NOT '06 SAAMI limits.

6) Long skinny rds can be every bit as accurate LR as short fat ones. This means bug holes at 100yds and sub MOA out to 1000m. I like the new tech but get frustrated by all the misguided hype.

7) Freebore isn't as bad as I had originally thought.

In short, the 7 Mystic is my version of the 280AI and its many variations. The whole project started because of my two 7RM's. Shooting them has been an absolute joy using 162gr Amax. I wanted to build a smaller case for less recoil in the light class usually shot at the Osoyoos 1000m fun shoots.

The '06 case was the parent case as I have a bunch of brass and this would mean all I needed was to neck down to form the secondary shoulder needed for fireforming. From the many number of 280AI type wildcats, I knew the case capacity and performance would be an ideal match.

Reg. '06 brass is run through a 7RM FL sizer and it forms a perfect second shoulder. One step and ready to fireform. Cases were fireformed using the Cream of Wheat method. All further sizing is done in a Lee Collet 7RM neck die. Seating done in a 7RM seating die (really does work well). So all you need is a Lee Delux die set ($45) and you are ready to load ammo.

I did trim slightly and neck turn enough to take a hair off at least 50% of the neck circumferance. Just cleans things up.

The barrel was sent to Dennis Sorenson with some necked down brass to use as headspace guages. The barrel returned in a very short time with BR quality machining and fit. Believe me, the thread fit on action and barrel nut is interference tight (you need light pressure using the nut wrench to screw on, hand assembly isn't easy - perfect). Set up for zero headspace for a rock solid lock up. These Savage actions are the only commercial actions I have played with that don't really need the lugs lapped to lock up very well. Maybe it's that floating bolt head.

From shooting lots of similar cartridges in different calibres, I knew that H4350 or H4831SC would be the ideal powders. I put in Fed 210M primers to handle the ignition chores and H4350 for the first powder. I have found the Feds to work very well but show pressure signs 'faster' then the CCI BR2 primers. This would keep me from going to hot too fast.

With my chrony, I shot two rds starting at 54gr. Way too low (2750fps). Jumped up to 56gr for a bit more velocity (2830fps) and a 1/2" group. Up to 57.5grs and 2934/2942 fps and a bit under 1". Cases still extracted easily and showed no pressure signs. I knew I was getting close.

The next load at 58gr cut one hole and 2949/2960fps. Voila!! Still no excessive pressure signs but primers are starting to flatten meaning I am in magnum pressure territory.

At 58.5gr, obvious pressures signs showed. Velocity was 2949/2971fps and groups opened up a bit to 1/4". For the 7C ambient temp, this was as high as I will go. Will back down a bit more during the spring/summer or as tuning requires.

All design goals met so far. Now to come back another day and confirm.

The next time the weather was much colder (a few degs below zero). 58gr showed 2951/2925/2932/2917fps. A bit off and groups around 1/2". Going up to 58.5gr was 2951/2960/2947fps and back to big bughole group. Going to 59gr reached 3000fps but groups opened right up to 2" and we be toasty.

Seems 2950fps avg and magnum pressures is where this combo likes to be.
This barrel shoots its best just below 'excessive' pressure signs which is ideal in my books.

I switched to H4831SC but velocity never exceeded 2850fps before groups opened up (60grs of powder). Accuracy was also very good around the 2800fps mark. Again, showing how critical powder choice can be in obtaining max performance.

In this rifles case, the perfect powder would be H4350 and a half. H4350 is just a hair fast (quite peaky too) and H4831SC too slow. Maybe Re19/22 would be ideal???? Maybe a different primer??? I can go to 60grs of some powder so maybe there is a bit more velocity and/or give me a wider sweet spot. Either way, the 7 Mystic is working to design goals.

More shooting will follow to again verify my results and shooting at longer distances will start once the snow melts and temps go up. Pretty hard to get great groups when your fingers are a bit numb. Barrels don't get hot though.

If you are wondering why I shoot two rd groups when testing, it is because I am very confident in how I shoot and the consistency of my ammo. So unless I screw up, a load that shoots 1" is never going to improve. Conversely, cutting two or more rds in one hole is rarely a fluke, especially if you repeat a few times. I don't feel the need to drive many bullets into tiny groups to prove a load or cartridge. I prefer that barrel wear be spent shooting LR targets.

At 58gr, I am using less powder then either the 7WSM and RSAUM to get the same performance. The 7Mystic shatters performance limits and is the shape of all hot rod cartridges to come. Three colour glossy ad with dead really big animal. Zip, Zam, Blam, POW, and other marketing splashes...

Have I just discovered the 'magic' bullet...??????? The next great cartridge evolution????? :eek:

NOPE. ;)

All I have done is my homework and matched components for best effect. In fact, the case volume of my Mystic is within spitting distance of the RSAUM (so is the load data which I graciously used to work up from). At magnum pressures, performance is within the difference found in rifles of the same cartridge.

This performance is nothing new for 280AI and wildcats in a smooth barrel.

So long skinny or short fat makes precious little difference, especially in a hunting rig. Choose whatever makes you warm and fuzzy.

Of course, there are ideal case designs for very specific short range competive shooting. For 1000yd/m shooting, I am guessing that 10fps spreads and groups in the 1's at 100yds bode well for this cartridge and barrel performance.

The reason for point 7) was that in the chamber cutting stage, Dennis highlighted that the 280AI reamer he was using would move the throat about .150" ahead of 'ideal' (actually 0.115" in the rifle). Quite a bit of freebore but the bullet would still be fully supported by the neck as it engraved.

I have always loaded my match bullets as close to the lands as possible and was quite nervous that this wouldn't work. But hey, in the quest of knowledge - full speed ahead.

If it failed, I would seat the bullets out further. Right now they are seated to fit in the mag (I use the same seating die setting for three rifles with equal success - go figure). If that failed, I would just set back the barrel again and use a standard 280AI case.

The freebore has provided me with the big benefit of running faster velocities without excessive pressures. The same thing Mr. WBY pioneered all those years ago.

The key then for accuracy isn't the closeness of the bullet to the lands (at least with this very long bullet) but that the bullet engraves TRUE with the bore before it leaves the case neck. Using fireformed brass sized in the Lee die produces ammo with very little runout.

A short throat or jamming into the lands would be very helpful if high runout ammo or certain VLD bullets were used (bullets will have their own preference so test accordingly).

Having a chamber cut true with the bore doesn't hurt either. Great work Dennis.

The 7 Mystic project has been a success and met all my 7 goals. I hope this will inspire you to start reloading with a different view and maybe even help you into the wonderful world of wildcats.

There are no free lunches but it is nice to know where they give you an extra big serving of the good stuff.

Enjoy...

Jerry




From Left to Right: Orig '06 case, necked down ready for fireforming, fireformed, Amax seated, Amax for bullet length reference.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting article Jerry, some day I hope to have enough knowledge to attempt something like that also.I'm afraid if I attempted that now I would probably blow something up. But your article does get a guy to thinking. Do you have any pictures to go along with the post?
 
LRC, with the amount of info available today, wildcatting is a cinch. In fact, true wildcatting is almost impossible due to the number of variations already produced by the factory and wildcatters over the years. There really isn't much that hasn't already been tried, short of making a new case.

Maybe a 6.5 or 7mmSPC is in order....

As I allude to in my post, the key is case volume/cal/bullet. The new Lee manual includes 'useable case volumes' so you have a ready reference to start comparing. Take a look and you will see the similar case volumes yield similar results (same max pressures).

Very hard to design something today without some baseline to work from. In fact, wildcatters are usually SAFER then the average reloader because they will review a lot of data and compare results before starting.

Many reloaders take load data at face value with no thought about the actual components and how they affect pressures. Bullets like Barnes X, AMax, and Interlock all work quite differently dispite having the 'same' specs.

Changes in powder lots can have huge variations in the data. I have seen start data that exceeded max data due to changes in the powder. That would get exciting. Always seek the newest data when working on loads. Things do change.

Example, the first batch of Varget is not the same as the Varget from Higginsons today. Even greater variance with something like H4831 where production spans 50yrs+ and a few factories.

If you reload safely now, you can start to wildcat. Remember that with the huge variations in every rifle, you essentially 'wildcat' everytime you buy a new rifle!!!!

Cat, pressures would not be excessive at all. Without the freebore, you would have a 7JRS with a slightly forward shoulder or a Gibbs with a slightly rearward shoulder. Both of these have been around for quite a few years and perform very well.

The main difference in mine is that I base my design from a set of dies. Call it reverse engineering.

The 'right' powder choice would probably be H4831SC instead of H4350. That's about as dramatic an affect as would be expected. I would speculate that 58 to 60gr of H4831SC in a no freebore chamber would yield the same results I am getting now.

Something to think about as your rifle wears from use. You may need to change powders to keep the barrel/load in tune. Just make sure the bullet can engage the lands fully before leaving the case neck.

Think of freebore as gunsmith supplied throat erosion.

Glad you like the post and will get some pics up after the weekend.

Jerry
 
For a powder choice why don't you try H1000.I am using 67 grs in my 7mm sarum and am getting 3050fps out of a 24" barrel with no preasure signs.I am also using 162 Amax's.But with Molly.My groupings are usually around the 1/8 to a 1/4 max for 5 shots.
 
Thanks for the H1000 info. Unfortunately, that much powder will not fit in the case. With the wider fat magnums, you can push the powder sideways and cram more in. With the '06 case, the powder packs up and I don't like to crush powder when seating.

Also, with the poor showing of H4831SC, I doubt a slower powder will improve things.

The perfect powder in this case would be between the H4350 and H4831SC powders. Re 19 is probably the nearest thing but using Alliant powders is a pain and more expensive then the Hodgdon. Not temp stable either.

For the few extra grains I might be able to cram in there, not that big a deal. Also, the slight increase in velocity will not affect target or game.

I can reach 3000fps but accuracy is the pits.

Jerry
 
I use the quikload program as a basis ofr my wildcatting, but use the same die system as you do for development.

The pressure system that the program uses does not take into account custom chambers, but you can adjust your seating depth, etc.

It is a great program, but some use it as a load data book , and it is certainly not!

It does give you a good guideline , however.
This is one of the chartws from the quikload program for the 280AI cartridge with the 162 Hornady.
As you stated, your cartridge is likjely okay with the freebore that is built into the chamber
Cat
Cartridge : .280 Ack Imp
Bullet : .284, 162, HDY BTSP 2845
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.330 inch or 84.58 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch or 609.6 mm
Powder : Hodgdon H4350

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-10.0 85 52.65 2612 2454 44028 10701 95.7 1.371
-09.0 86 53.24 2640 2507 45422 10825 96.1 1.351
-08.0 87 53.82 2668 2561 46868 10946 96.5 1.331
-07.0 88 54.41 2696 2615 48355 11064 96.8 1.313
-06.0 89 54.99 2724 2670 49885 11179 97.2 1.294
-05.0 90 55.58 2752 2725 51457 11290 97.5 1.275 ! Near Maximum !
-04.0 91 56.16 2780 2780 53074 11398 97.8 1.257 ! Near Maximum !
-03.0 92 56.75 2808 2836 54740 11502 98.1 1.239 ! Near Maximum !
-02.0 93 57.33 2836 2893 56459 11602 98.4 1.222 ! Near Maximum !
-01.0 94 57.92 2864 2950 58232 11698 98.7 1.204 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+00.0 95 58.50 2892 3008 60063 11790 98.9 1.188 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+01.0 95 59.09 2919 3066 61953 11878 99.1 1.171 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0 96 59.67 2947 3124 63903 11962 99.3 1.155 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0 97 60.26 2975 3183 65918 12041 99.4 1.139 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 98 60.84 3002 3242 67999 12116 99.6 1.123 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0 99 61.43 3030 3302 70148 12187 99.7 1.107 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 95 58.50 3011 3261 70667 11515 100.0 1.107 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 95 58.50 2728 2677 49635 11511 93.8 1.292
 
Very interesting. A nice place to get some general info but actual rifle results will vary.

I do like the 2950fps velocity predicting chamber pressure of around 64000psi (normal magnum pressures). More powder then I am using which fits in with the variations due to load components and rifle. Right in there with what I was expecting.

Just remember that the BTSP is different from the AMax, the SST, and the Interbond as far as bore friction and bearing surface is concerned. Has a real affect on pressures and velocities. You need to use the right bullet and primer inorder to get better results.

At least it's a start...

Jerry
 
mysticplayer said:
Very interesting. A nice place to get some general info but actual rifle results will vary.

I do like the 2950fps velocity predicting chamber pressure of around 64000psi (normal magnum pressures). More powder then I am using which fits in with the variations due to load components and rifle. Right in there with what I was expecting.

Just remember that the BTSP is different from the AMax, the SST, and the Interbond as far as bore friction and bearing surface is concerned. Has a real affect on pressures and velocities. You need to use the right bullet and primer inorder to get better results.

At least it's a start...

Jerry

OOPS!! I thought it was the BTSP, not thhe A MAX!

BTW, do you know the water capacity of your case?
That would allow me to design the case on the program.

Here is the data using the 162 A-MAX.
cat
Cartridge : .280 Ack Imp
Bullet : .284, 162, HDY A-MAX 28402
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.330 inch or 84.58 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch or 609.6 mm
Powder : Hodgdon H4350

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-10.0 88 52.65 2655 2536 46720 10643 96.2 1.334
-09.0 89 53.24 2684 2591 48247 10761 96.6 1.314
-08.0 90 53.82 2712 2646 49821 10876 97.0 1.295
-07.0 91 54.41 2741 2703 51454 10988 97.3 1.276 ! Near Maximum !
-06.0 92 54.99 2770 2759 53135 11096 97.6 1.257 ! Near Maximum !
-05.0 93 55.58 2798 2817 54865 11200 98.0 1.239 ! Near Maximum !
-04.0 94 56.16 2827 2874 56647 11300 98.2 1.221 ! Near Maximum !
-03.0 95 56.75 2855 2933 58486 11397 98.5 1.203 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
-02.0 96 57.33 2884 2991 60387 11489 98.8 1.186 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
-01.0 97 57.92 2912 3051 62352 11577 99.0 1.169 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+00.0 98 58.50 2941 3110 64384 11660 99.2 1.152 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+01.0 99 59.09 2969 3171 66485 11740 99.4 1.136 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0 100 59.67 2997 3231 68659 11814 99.5 1.119 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0 101 60.26 3025 3292 70908 11884 99.7 1.104 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 102 60.84 3054 3354 73235 11949 99.8 1.088 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0 102 61.43 3082 3416 75645 12009 99.9 1.073 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 98 58.50 3058 3363 75843 11334 100.0 1.075 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 98 58.50 2778 2776 53136 11455 94.5 1.252 ! Near Maximum !
 
Very impressed with how close the prediction is to my rifle's performance. You can see how the bullet has affected pressures and velocities.

Interesting that they do not spec the primer. That has shown to have very dramatic results on pressures. I will try the CCI BR2 and see what happens.

No idea what the water capacity is. If it has the 7JRS or Gibbs, pretty much the same.

Jerry
 
The Gibbs is in there I believe , Mystic.
The cool thibg about this program is that fact that you can design your own cases with it, calculate recoil, burn rate, etc.
You can also input a "friction proof" setting for moly, etc.

The DOWNSIDE to the program (there's always a downside:confused: )
is that it doees not give different primers, or chamber dimension imputs.
Also, there are some powders, like Retumbo for one, that are not in there.
The only SURE way of calculating opressure of course, would be with a strain gauge.

But, as you said, it is interesting , and can give you an idea of where you want to go.
The trajectory charts are VERY good, BTW!
Cat
 
Last edited:
It would be impossible for any program to calculate all the variables that can happen in chamber design. I think the average taken is more then sufficient.

Besides the bore alone is a nightmare to try and figure out. Start low and work up. The best way.

Glad to hear that the ballistics charts work well. What type of bullets have you tested against? Any option to change the drag (G) function?

A strain guage would be a great tool. However, since the action/primer are likely to show pressures signs before things get too hot, I will continue to use them for better or worse.

I usually work up in 1/2gr increments even in larger cases. That keeps things safe.

Jerry
 
You can change the seating depth, depth of groove and land widths, etc.
I only checked yours against the two bullets, but there are almopst all brands in theere including the europeans.
I think you can imput dragg function and even design a bullet with it, but that is beyond my computer capabilities!:mad: :confused:

I likely only use about 2% of the program's capabilities.....!
Cat
 
Jerry, a powder that sits between H4350 and H4831 is Vihtavuori N-160. I have found this to be a great powder for accuracy in 30-06 sized cases. Why domn't you give it a try if you can lay your hands on some? I wish you were cvloser, since I have an ample supply. Regards, Eagleye.
 
Thanks EE. You are most certainly right on the Viht powder but even more difficult to find in my area and much more expensive elsewhere.

The slight difference in performance isn't worth the cost. At most, the rifle will go 3000 to 3050fps before the barrel goes out of tune. Probably more like a strong 2965fps.

I think where I will find some gains is in changing primers. The CCI should burn with less pressure so could allow for more powder and increased velocity. At least, I have a bunch so can easily test.

Will post in a bit. Too wet right now.

Jerry
 
Hi Jerry,
I'm guessing the same process could be used with a 6.5 cal.
Would you just use 264 mag dies?.
I'd like to try a 6.5 for f class but I'd like a little more umpf
than a 260 AI. And I have a Long action I'm not doing much acept sitting in the safe.
Not that I need another LR rifle but a dog doesnt really need to lick
himself iether he just does it because he can.

regards
 
Rotek
If you interested in using 6.5 cal you may want to look into the 6.5/284 that is the dominant caliber for F class. It will work in the long action and will allow you to seat the bullets out futher.
 
Rotek, the wildcat I designed for exactly what you are wanting is call the 6.5 Mystic. Think of it as a 6.5 Gibbs short. The case is improved and shoulder of the 308 case moved forward. Seating the bullet out, it provides a very nice case capacity that in longer F class or 1000yd BR rifles will give you around 2900fps and use about 5 to 8gr less powder then the 6.5-284.

The 6.5-284 is a wonderful cartridge but is hard on throats. Most don't run at 3000 or faster anyways so the case volume is not used effectively.

I wanted a smaller case volume to allow for 100% load density. This is achieved with the Mystic with low ES. The prototype rifle showed alot of potential and am working on a full 16.5lbs class rifle now (just need my barrel block to be finished).

Something else to consider.

Jerry



6.5 Mystic with and without 140gr SST next to a 308 case for comparison.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom