In support of pacobillie's post, I have a STIGA 30-06 rifle here. So was made from an M94 or M96 Swede receiver - probably M94 because of the turned down bolt handle. The magazine box was opened at the front and made longer. The receiver area at front of magazine slot (behind the lower bolt lug recess) was opened up to fit, and to feed 30-06 length cartridges - the key, though, for me, was that the assembly was then proofed, which establishes there is no problem with pressure from standard 30-06 loads. I was not able to discover anywhere in Canada to get proof testing done. From this CGN website, was also confirmed that the throats in those STIGA rifles are unusually long, again, a known technique to bleed off breech pressure that the receiver and bolt get exposed to. So, those modifications to make a 30-06 length, could also be made to achieve a 9.3x62 length. And then the magazine well in the stock also opened up. The same bottom metal is used, although the fixed magazine box was extended. My own choice for a 9.3x62 is a Husqvarna based on a commercial FN Mauser 98, with the solid left side wall - I believe Husqvarna marketed that as a Model 649, although it also might be a Model 640 - there are no model markings on it.
For whatever reason, it appears Husqvarna made various models of rifles using both the M96 small ring receiver and the m98 large ring receiver, but sold them with the same model numbers. I do not know why, but similar to the Swede military that did not distinguish between M38 that were converted from older M96, versus newly made M38 rifles - all were "M38" to them.
The main difference would be the original M94/M96 rifles were "#### on close", although some might be able to be converted to #### on open with after market parts and creativity. The ones based on the various 98's would be "#### on open" - is apparently an important distinction to some users.
