If you spend less, you get less.
the older guns have the "bugs" worked out of them already. The sights are usually set for the gun. They do not require a new set of sights, trigger, etc. to make them function and can be fixed with a paperclip rather than a trip to a gunsmith.
if the youngster decides that they are not really interested, you have not spent big $ to get a gun and the rest can buy ammo. And the older guns are gaining in popularity and value. And do not have to be kept for 50 years to be a heirloom....they already are. I would not trade my 70 year old Mossberg in for any of the new models. Thousands of shots thru her and still hits where she is pointed.
I'd go with something along the lines of a Marlin 925 or a Savage Mark II. Or I'm sure every gunstore has a rack full of great .22's for $100.00. As far as spending $500 + to get a "decent" .22 rifle I just think that's nuts.
Not exactly 100% in agreement with this.
If you can find one, get a nice Cooey single shot bolt-action. I lucked into one for 50 bucks in EE and I won a rimfire competition last July and placed 2nd with the same rifle the July before... And I can get it to reach out with half-assed accuracy at 100M !
It's built like a tank, has a fairly heavy barrel and is DEADLY accurate with it's ironsights! I'd recommend a Cooey single shot to any new shooter, as you can get them in lighter models as well, and they're more than affordable than spending 500 bucks in a rifle.
...realistically, we have to see what pleases the young shooter. My son was happy to be hitting paper at 100 yards. it started the wheels rolling into the centrfire rifles. Precision is not a MUST at the beginning, just developing the interest is important.