It's a lot easier to do that when you are already tooled up and producing the rifle. All you have to do it fill the pantograph machine with higher grade wood and send the metal to the custom shop for proper polishing and bluing. A reintroduced 71, will all the associated handwork, would take a lot longer and cost a ferocious price. Look what they're asking for a Marlin off the shelf!Well chit, make a limited run like Remington did with the Classic run.
Me thinks.![]()
Sure!Can you post some pics of your 1939 vintage Model 71? And welcome to the forum.
Wow! Beautiful!
Agree. The 71 and the 64 were the two best stocked woods rifles winchester made imo. But hunters were switching to bolt actions in droves in the 1950's.I love the form of the Winchester 71. The best lever action ever made for long cartridges, combined with a button mag, shotgun butt instead of the carbine/crescent plates. It just makes for a fantastic hunting configuration. If only Winchester went + or - .010" when selecting a bore diameter for their new cartridge.
X2 Nothing finer my 71 and 64 are coming with me to the Netherland. No guns made today match the old Winnies. Totaly agree on the 358 model 88 I have two.Agree. The 71 and the 64 were the two best stocked woods rifles winchester made imo. But hunters were switching to bolt actions in droves in the 1950's.
Winchester did actually go minus .010 plus .010 from the .348 though. The 33 Winchester 1886 came out in 1903 and the lightweight 33 was very similar to the 71 minus the pistol grip. And the .358 was introduced in the 88 lever in the 1950's.
Never understood why the .358 never got more popular. A super woods round for large game. Maybe another victim of the switch to bolt rifles?



























