A little STG 44 video

For that gun the magazine is NORMAL capacity NOT LARGE. We all get it. But any loonie left watching might pee their pants when they hear that word. Even some of our fellow CGN members are left leaning....
 
GUB said:
For that gun the magazine is NORMAL capacity NOT LARGE. We all get it. But any loonie left watching might pee their pants when they hear that word. Even some of our fellow CGN members are left leaning....
Click to expand...

Then that would be there issue they need to deal with. Part of the reason the firearms community is in the shape it's in is because we tip toed around the left and the anti's.
If those types of things bother cgn members then maybe they are part of the problem not the solution as well. Attitudes like that is exactly what divided gun owners allowed C-68 to come into place.
 
GUB said:
For that gun the magazine is NORMAL capacity NOT LARGE. We all get it. But any loonie left watching might pee their pants when they hear that word. Even some of our fellow CGN members are left leaning....
Click to expand...

If you're scared of particular wording, they've already won...

Great video guys!
 
I agree guys. The Fudds that have a deer and duck gun only. And think no one else should own any other type of firearm are a real problem. I try to inform them ( if they will listen) on the history of registration in Canada.
The wording doesn't scare me . But you do have to govern your actions to the area you live in.
Just a FYI. I was up in Williams Lake on the weekend. ( small mill town B.C.) and guys still drive around with guns in their pickup windows, and will be passing and showing each other rifles in the Timmies parking lot.
Try that in West Kelowna and it will not work out well for you...
 
There is someone working on one in different calibers. ht tp://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015/06/24/stg-44-in-5-56-and-7-62x39-on-the-way/
 
^ not a close enough representation of the original, although it may not be finished or it's the model making it look off. If someone could make the original as close as possible yet fire x39 it would be an insta-buy for me.

Grumpy, how is the mag availability? Definitely interested in one of these.
 
GUB said:
For that gun the magazine is NORMAL capacity NOT LARGE. We all get it. But any loonie left watching might pee their pants when they hear that word. Even some of our fellow CGN members are left leaning....
Click to expand...

Well thank you for that counter productive comment to an otherwise well intentioned and informative new thread!----Dieseldog!
 
GUB said:
For that gun the magazine is NORMAL capacity NOT LARGE. We all get it. But any loonie left watching might pee their pants when they hear that word. Even some of our fellow CGN members are left leaning....
Click to expand...

Left leaning member here. The reason im here is not for politics, but for my shared love and interest in firearms.

You have some time to waste in arguing this "normal" vs "large" point. Non sequitur.
 
Don Kael said:
^ not a close enough representation of the original, although it may not be finished or it's the model making it look off. If someone could make the original as close as possible yet fire x39 it would be an insta-buy for me.

Grumpy, how is the mag availability? Definitely interested in one of these.
Click to expand...

We have a few spares left (the large ones LOL) and scope mounts as well. Mags will be readily available for time to come as far as we are aware.
 
Grumpy Wolverine said:
Then that would be there issue they need to deal with. Part of the reason the firearms community is in the shape it's in is because we tip toed around the left and the anti's.
If those types of things bother cgn members then maybe they are part of the problem not the solution as well. Attitudes like that is exactly what divided gun owners allowed C-68 to come into place.
Click to expand...
Well said sir!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom